Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In the PDE as below$$ \partial_t u - \frac{i}{\rho} ( - \partial_x^2 )^{\rho /2} u = 0 \;\;\;(t,x) \in \Bbb R^2 $$ How can I prove that $$ (- \partial_x ^2 )^{\rho/ 2} = \scr F ^{-1} | \xi |^\rho \scr F $$ where $\scr F$ is Fourier transform. Is this just definition?

share|cite|improve this question
What is the meaning of $(-\partial_x^2)^{\frac{\rho}{2}}u$ ? – doraemonpaul Oct 2 '12 at 9:42

Using properties of the Fourier transform, we can write the Laplacian operator as a Fourier multiplier $$(-\Delta)f = [|\xi|^2\hat{f}(\xi)]^{\vee}$$ Generalizing this idea, define the operator $D_x^\alpha$ $$D_x^\alpha f = (-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}f = [|\xi|^\alpha\hat{f}(\xi)]^{\vee}$$ which is referred to as the homogeneous derivative or fractional Laplacian. The inverse is the Riesz potential.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.