Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Can anyone help me understand what happens to the following inequality once I apply a logarithm to all three parts? $$ - \varepsilon < 2^{\frac{1}{x}} < \varepsilon \longrightarrow \ln(- \varepsilon )< \ln 2^{\frac{1}{x}} < \ln\varepsilon $$ where $\epsilon > 0$. Can I rewrite it this way? Are they both correct and solvable? $$ \begin{cases} \ln (- \varepsilon ) < \ln 2^{\frac{1}{x}}\\ \ln( \varepsilon ) > \ln 2^{\frac{1}{x}} \end{cases} $$

share|improve this question
1  
First, isn't a power of a number always positive? (Unless you are working with complex powers, but I don't think that's the case here). Second, can you take the logarithm of a negative number? (Again, no complex numbers assumed). –  Raskolnikov Sep 30 '12 at 18:34

1 Answer 1

If $x$ is a real number then $2^{1/x}$ is necessarily positive, so the set of values of $x$ for which $-\varepsilon<2^{1/x}<\varepsilon$ is the same as the set of values of $x$ for which $2^{1/x}<\varepsilon$. If $x$ is not a real number, then there's the problem of what the inequalities mean.

You can't take $\ln$ of a negative number, and if you could, there's the big fat question of whether it would preserve inequalities.

Certainly it preserves inequalities among positive numbers, i.e. $\ln$ is an increasing function.

So you have $2^{1/x}<\varepsilon$; hence $\ln(2^{1/x})<\ln\varepsilon$.

If you don't know that that implies $\frac1x\ln 2<\ln\varepsilon$ then you really need to work on your understanding of logarithms before getting into problems like this.

From there, and the fact that $\ln2$ is positive, it's easy to deduce that $x>\dfrac{\ln2}{\ln\varepsilon}= \dfrac{1}{\log_2\varepsilon}$.

Maybe using base-$2$ logarithms is a bit quicker: \begin{align} 2^{1/x} & < \varepsilon \\[6pt] \frac1x & < \log_2\varepsilon \\[6pt] x & > \frac{1}{\log_2\varepsilon} \end{align}

share|improve this answer
    
Michael Hardy, did you mean $x > \frac{\ln{2}}{\ln{\varepsilon}}$? I think you missed out a "ln" at the denominator. –  WobbyWindows Sep 30 '12 at 18:51
    
I've fixed the typo. –  Michael Hardy Oct 1 '12 at 16:36
    
....and there was another typo, now fixed. –  Michael Hardy Oct 1 '12 at 16:43

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.