Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a problem with the following question on Dedekind's cut.

Is the set $\{t\in \mathbb{Q}: -t\not\in r\}$, where $r$ is a real number (a cut), a Dedekind cut? Why or why not?

The definition of Dedekind's cut here is: nonempty, not $\mathbb{Q}$, contains all rational number smaller than it, and does not contain a largest element.

Thank you.

share|cite|improve this question
What have you tried? About which property of a Dedekind cut are you unsure here? – Michael Greinecker Sep 30 '12 at 14:43
Hint: What if $r$ is rational? – celtschk Sep 30 '12 at 14:51

Hint: Consider a cut $r$ which is the set of rationals less than zero. So we are to be consider $\{t \in \mathbb{Q}\colon -t \not< 0\}$. How does the condition simplify?

share|cite|improve this answer

Hint: If $r$ represents an irrational number, then yes, if a rational number, then not (in the given interpretation of Dedekind-cut).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.