Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $X$ be a smooth manifold and $\pi:E\rightarrow X$ a vector bundle of rank $k$ on X. If one manages to redefine $E$ by using a cocycle $\{g_{\alpha,\beta}\}$ whose values are all contained in a subgroup $G$ of $GL(k)$, then one says that $E$ is a $G$-bundle.

Many textbooks say that $E$ comes with a metric (a smoothly-varying fiber-wise metric), the structure group can be reduced to $O(k)$. I am not really convinced with this fact; starting with a transition function $\{g_{\alpha,\beta}\}$ whose values are just in $GL(k)$, is it obvious that one can make a new transition function whose values are just in $O(k)$?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

If $\{U_{\gamma}\}$ is an open cover of $X$ which trivialises $E$, then over $U_{\alpha}$, there are sections $s_1, \dots, s_m$ such that $\{s_i(x)\ |\ i = 1, \dots, m\}$ is a basis for $E_{x}$ for every $x \in U_{\alpha}$ ($m$ is the rank of $E$). Suppose now that $x \in U_{\alpha}\cap U_{\beta}$, and let $\sigma_1, \dots, \sigma_m$ be the corresponding sections; in particular $\{\sigma_i(x)\ |\ i = 1, \dots, m\}$ is also a basis for $E_x$. Then there is a change of basis matrix $g_{\alpha\beta}(x)$ which transforms $\{\sigma_i(x)\ |\ i = 1, \dots, m\}$ into $\{s_i(x)\ |\ i = 1, \dots, m\}$; that is $s_i(x) = g_{\alpha\beta}(x)\sigma_i(x)$ for $i = 1, \dots, m$.

A choice of metric on $E$ gives an inner product $\langle \cdot, \cdot\rangle_x$ on $E_x$. This allows us to measure angles; in particular, we can apply the Gram-Schmidt process to obtain an orthonormal basis for $E_x$. Therefore, we can take both $\{\sigma_i(x)\ |\ i = 1, \dots, m\}$ and $\{s_i(x)\ |\ i = 1, \dots, m\}$ to be orthonormal bases for $E_x$. Note that

$$\delta_{ij} = \langle s_i(x), s_j(x)\rangle_x = \langle g_{\alpha\beta}(x)\sigma_i(x), g_{\alpha\beta}(x)\sigma_j(x)\rangle_x,$$


$$\delta_{ij} = \langle\sigma_i(x), \sigma_j(x)\rangle_x.$$

Therefore $\langle\sigma_i(x), \sigma_j(x)\rangle_x = \langle g_{\alpha\beta}(x)\sigma_i(x), g_{\alpha\beta}(x)\sigma_j(x)\rangle_x$, so $g_{\alpha\beta}(x)$ preserves the inner product and is therefore an element of the orthogonal group.

share|improve this answer
I see. The point is that on sufficiently small open sets one can take sections which form an orthonormal basis. Thank you very much. –  Pooya Sep 29 '12 at 6:24
@Pooya: Yes, but sufficiently small only in the sense that the bundle in trivial over those open sets. –  Michael Albanese Sep 29 '12 at 6:35
@MichaelAlbanese : Can you explain this part " A choice of metric on $E$ gives an inner product $⟨⋅,⋅⟩_x$ on $E_x$ in more detail? –  Babai Mar 27 at 11:28
Also, Your could have directly started your argument by taking two Orthonormal basis for $E_x$. (You are basically saying there exists sections which is a local frame. But is it really required for the proof?) –  Babai Mar 27 at 11:49
@Babai: A Riemannian metric is a smoothly varying choice of inner product on each tangent space. I couldn't have started with an orthonormal basis for $E_x$ because the notion of an orthonormal basis requires you to have an inner product on $E_x$. For example, if $V$ is a vector space and $v_1, v_2 \in V\setminus\{0\}$, can you tell me whether or not they are orthonormal? No, because you don't know what the inner product is. Once I tell you which inner product I have chosen, then you can talk about orthonormality. –  Michael Albanese Mar 29 at 17:47

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.