Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was doing an exercise in a book which asked the question "what can be said about a divergent sequence which diverges to neither $\infty$ or $-\infty$?" I came up with the answer that it is bounded. I was wondering two things:
1. Is there anything more you can say about it?
The above led me to think about:
2. Is there a concept of a sequence of numbers converging to a certain range of numbers? and would this even be useful? I'm thinking then that the $\epsilon, N$ defn. of convergence to a limit would be a special case of the "convergence to a range of numbers" when the range has only one number in it.
Thanks for any thoughts/advice. :)


p.s. the exercise is not for a grade for a class, it's just out of curiosity.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Not necessarily bounded. Look at $1,0,2,0,3,0,4,0,5,0,\dots$.

And yes, if we have a sequence, we can look at its set of accumulation points. These are all numbers $x$ such that there is an infinite subsequence of our sequence that converges to $x$. Alternately, $x$ is called a limit point of the sequence. The concept is useful. One can alter the definition to throw in the possibility of $\infty$ and $-\infty$.

A sequence $(a_n)$ converges to a real number iff it has exactly one accumulation point.

Interesting example: Look at the sequence $\sin(1), \sin(2), \sin(3),\dots$. Then every number if $[-1,1]$ is an accumulation point of the sequence.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.