Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $u$ be a $C^2$ function from $\mathbb{C}^n$ to $\mathbb{C}$. Define $$ \partial u = \sum\limits_{i=1}^n \frac{\partial u}{\partial z_i}dz_i, \\ \overline{\partial} u = \sum\limits_{i=1}^n \frac{\partial u}{\partial \overline{z}_i}d\overline{z}_i $$ If $v = v' \wedge dz_i$, we can define $\partial v = \partial v' \wedge dz_i$, $\overline{\partial} v = \overline{\partial} v' \wedge dz_i$ and by analogy we can define such operators for $v = v'' \wedge d \overline{z}_i$. Next we define operators $$ d = \partial + \overline{\partial}, \;\;\; d^c = i(\overline{\partial} - \partial) $$ We have $dd^c u = 2i \partial \overline{\partial} u$. I want to compute $n$-th exterior power of $dd^c u$. Is it possible to do it without direct calculations that involve change of summation variables?

share|cite|improve this question
Are $v'$ and $v''$ 1-forms? – Mercy King Sep 27 '12 at 12:51
@Mercy, $v'$ and $v''$ are functions for which operators $\partial$ and $\overline{\partial}$ are already defined. Then such operators are defined on $1$-forms and you can think of $v'$ and $v''$ as of $1$-forms to define it on $2$-forms – Nimza Sep 27 '12 at 13:22
What is then the meaning of the notation $v'\wedge dz_i$? – Mercy King Sep 27 '12 at 14:22
@Mercy If $v'$ is a function, then $v' \wedge dz_i = v' dz_i$. – Nimza Sep 27 '12 at 14:41
@Mercy Notation is from Kiselman's "Plurisubharmonic functions and potential theory in several complex variables", 1998, page 3. Furthermore, this notation is well used in differential geometry in MSU. I don't know why you don't like it. And $\omega^n = \omega \wedge \ldots \wedge \omega$ ($n$ times), you're right. – Nimza Sep 27 '12 at 14:52

If $u$ is $C^2$, then $$(dd^c u)^n = n! \, 4^n \, \det \left(\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial z_j\partial\bar z_k}\right)\,dV. $$

So, (ignoring constants that are usually irrelevant), $(dd^c u)^n$ is the determinant of the complex Hessian. The operator $(dd^c \cdot)^n$ is called the complex Monge-Ampère operator and plays a crucial role in pluripotential theory, the systematic study of plurisubharmonic (psh) functions. It is possible to extend the domain of definition of $(dd^c \cdot)^n$ to some classes of non-smooth psh functions, but not to all psh functions. Finding the optimal domain of definition for the complex Monge-Ampère operator is a problem with a long complicated history and was only recently completely settled. (See Cegrell, The General Definition of the Complex Monge-Ampère Operator, Ann. de l'Inst. Fourier, 54, (2004), p.159-179 and Blocki, The domain of definition of the complex Monge-Ampère operator, Amer. J. Math. 128 (2006), 519-530.)

Added for the follow-up question I think the easiest way to see that $(dd^c u)^n$ is a determinant, is to note that $$\omega_1 \wedge \omega_2 \wedge \cdots \wedge \omega_n$$ is an alternating multilinear form, almost by definition of the wedge product. The only alternating $n$-linear form on an $n$-dimensional vector space is (up to a constant multiple) the determinant. If you really need the constant, you have to plug in some cleverly chosen vectors to see what it is.

share|cite|improve this answer
I know it. I only want to show this equality with determinant without direct calculations (I'm able to show it with direct calculations. My question is similar to question: is there an easy way to calculate laplacian in spherical coordinates - it is easy to do it but in general we have to write a lot). – Nimza Sep 30 '12 at 7:26

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.