Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I need to show this result:

Let $\alpha :I\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2$ a smooth curve, where $I$ is a compact interval of the real line. If $\lVert \alpha (s) - \alpha (t) \rVert$ depends only on $|s-t|$, for all $s$, $t$ in $I$, then $\alpha$ must be a subset of a line or a circle.

I have tried calling $\lVert \alpha (s) - \alpha (t) \rVert=f(|s-t|)$, where $f$ is smooth but this led me nowhere. Also, I had a suggestion to fixing $t$ as $0$ and $\alpha(0)=0$ through reparametrization and a rigid movement, so I would have $\lVert\alpha(s) \rVert=f(|s|)$, $f$ is smooth; this lead to nothing also. I strongly believe I must show that the curvature of this function if constant, either $0$ (then it is a line) or it is a constant $\neq 0$ from where it is in a circle.

Can someone please give me a hint?

share|cite|improve this question
You can get proper norm bars using \lVert and \rVert. – joriki Sep 27 '12 at 1:45
Try to differentiate $\|\alpha(s+h) - \alpha(s)\|^2$ with respect to $s$. – user31373 Sep 27 '12 at 3:13
I have tried that, writing $\parallel \alpha(s+h)-\alpha (s)\parallel ^2t = < \alpha(s+h)-\alpha (s),\alpha(s+h)-\alpha (s)>$ When I call $g(t,s)=\parallel \alpha(t)-\alpha (s)\parallel$, and differentiate $g^2(t+h,t)$ with respect to $t$, this equals $f(|h|)$. Since $\frac{d}{dt}(f(|h|))=0$ the derivative of $g(t+h,t)^2$ is zero. Now give me a minute... – Marra Sep 27 '12 at 13:09
The reason for differentiating the square of distance is that you can write it as product of vector with itself and use the product rule for derivative. I don't promise that it will solve the problem, but it will give a kind of differential equation. – user31373 Sep 28 '12 at 1:42
Any progress yet? – user31373 Oct 1 '12 at 2:18
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Ok let me try it again.

First of all, suppose that $\alpha$ is parametrized by arc length.

Write $$\alpha(s)-\alpha(t)=\alpha'(t)(s-t)+\alpha''(t)\frac{(s-t)^{2}}{2}+o(|s-t|)$$


\begin{eqnarray} \|\alpha(s)-\alpha(t)\|^{2} &=& \|\alpha'(t)(s-t)+\alpha''(t)\frac{(s-t)^{2}}{2}+o(|s-t|)\|^{2} \nonumber \\ &=& \|\alpha'(t)(s-t)+\alpha''(t)\frac{(s-t)^{2}}{2}\|^{2}+2\langle\alpha'(t)(s-t)+\alpha''(t)\frac{(s-t)^{2}}{2},o(|s-t|)\rangle \nonumber \\ &&+\|o(|s-t|)\|^{2} \nonumber \\ &=& |s-t|^{2}+k(t)\frac{|s-t|^{4}}{4}+o(|s-t|) \end{eqnarray}

So, as you can see, if $k(t)$ is not constant $\|\alpha(s)-\alpha(t)\|$ depends on $k(t)$. Hence the only possibilities are the circle or the line. But an straightforward calculation shows that for the circle and the line the statement is true.

share|cite|improve this answer
This only proofs that the derivative of $\parallel \alpha '(s)\parallel=0$, that is, the tangent vector has a constant lenght and thus the curve is arc-lenght parameterized (just divide it by a constant). It does not prove that it is contained in a line or a curve. – Marra Oct 4 '12 at 18:37
You are right, i just saw it. Im trying to solve this problem here... Any idea? – Tomás Oct 4 '12 at 18:41
I've tried a lot of things using this same starting point. None of them resulted in what I want :( – Marra Oct 4 '12 at 19:17
Ok, I'm gonna check your answer within the hour, just arrived at home. Looks promising! Thanks! – Marra Oct 5 '12 at 21:24

You do not need differentiability. Below is a proof that works when $\alpha$ is only continuous.

We may assume that $I$ starts with $0$ : $I=[0,M]$ for some $M$. Suppose that the image of $\alpha$ is not contained in a line. Then there are $x_1<x_2<x_3$ such that $\alpha(x_1),\alpha(x_2),\alpha(x_3)$ are not collinear. Let $t\in ]0,M-x_3[$. Let now $x=x_4$ be an arbitrary number in $[0,M-t]$. Consider the two families of four points $A_i=\alpha(x_i) (1 \leq i \leq 4)$ and $B_i=\alpha(x_i+t) (1 \leq i \leq 4)$. They are isometric by hypothesis : $d(A_i,A_j)=d(B_i,B_j)$.

By this older StackOverflow question, there is an isometry $\gamma(x,t)$ of the plane sending $A_i$ to $B_i$. Since $\gamma(t)$ is already uniquely determined by its image on $\alpha(x_1),\alpha(x_2),\alpha(x_3)$, we see that $\gamma(x,t)=\gamma(t)$ is in fact independent of $x$, and we can explicitly write out the coefficients of the matrix of $\gamma(t)$ in terms of the coordinates of $\alpha(x_1),\alpha(x_2),\alpha(x_3)$ and $\alpha(x_1+t),\alpha(x_2+t),\alpha(x_3+t)$. So $\gamma$ will be continuous if $\alpha$ is. Unicity also ensures that $\gamma$ is a homomorphism (where it is defined) : $\gamma(s+t)=\gamma(s)\gamma(t)$ when $s,t$ and $s+t$ are all in $I$.

Now ${\sf det}(\gamma(t))=1$ or $-1$, and by continuity this determinant is always $1$ or always $-1$. Since $\gamma(0)$ is the identity, we see that $\gamma$ is always an (affine) rotation. We have $\gamma(s)\gamma(t)=\gamma(s+t)=\gamma(t)\gamma(s)$. We see that $\gamma(s)$ and $\gamma(t)$ commute, so they must share the same center point. We deduce that the center $\Omega$ of $\gamma(t)$ is independent of $t$. Now for any $s<t$, $\alpha(t)=\gamma(t-s)\alpha(s)$, so $\alpha(t)$ and $\alpha(s)$ are located at the same distance from $\Omega$. So $\alpha$ walks on a circle of cnter $\Omega$, qed.

share|cite|improve this answer
Well, I'd like some argument using the differentiability of the functions involved. – Marra Oct 4 '12 at 19:19
Just say that every differentiable function is continuous, and hence Ewan's proof applies. – Hagen von Eitzen Oct 4 '12 at 20:55
Which also does not solve it in an adequate way (it's a differential geometry problem), and also only proofs only that if it's not in a line then it's in a circle;the second part is missing (if it's not in a circle then it's in a line). – Marra Oct 5 '12 at 0:07
@Gustavo: Proving "A or B" is the same as proving "B" under the assumption that "A" is false, so there is no "second part" to worry about. – Jason DeVito Oct 5 '12 at 2:26

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.