Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $G$ be a finite, nonempty set with an operation $*$ such that

  1. $G$ is closed under $*$ and $*$ is associative
  2. Given $a,b,c \in G$ with $a*b=a*c$, then $b=c$.
  3. Given $a,b,c \in G$ with $b*a=c*a$, then $b=c$.

I want to prove that G is a group, but I don't know how to show that there exists an identity e $\in$ G such that $e*x=x$ and $x*e=x$ $\forall x \in G$. I also don't know how to show that $\forall$ x $\in G$ there exists a $y \in G$ such that $y*x=e$ and $x*y=e$. How do I do this?

share|improve this question
I suspect that (3) should be: Given $a,b,c\in G$ with $b*a=c*a$, then $b=c$. – Brian M. Scott Sep 26 '12 at 20:00
If we take your 3 literally, then $G$ has exactly one element and hence is - with the only possible operation - isomorphic to the trivial group. If we simply drop condition 3, then $G=\mathbb N$ and $*=+$ is a non-group model of your axioms. – Hagen von Eitzen Sep 26 '12 at 20:01
Sorry I was in a rush, I fixed it now. – Allison Cameron Sep 26 '12 at 20:03
1  
Note that finiteness is critical, otherwise take the positive integers under addition. – Will Jagy Sep 26 '12 at 20:09
1  
This is about a different question that I think you asked, about a group of $5$ elements. It can be done with no machinery, though it is unreasonably special. Suppose $xy\ne yx$. By properties of inverse, neither is $e$. Let $z$ be any group element other than these three. Look at $e$, $xy$, $yx$, $z$, $(xy)z$, $(yx)z$. Easily they must be all distinct. This contradicts order equal $5$. – André Nicolas Oct 3 '12 at 18:27

5 Answers

up vote 12 down vote accepted

Let $a$ be an element of $G$, and consider the function $f:G \to G$, $f(g)=ag$. This is injective by (2), and so (since $G$ is finite) it must also be surjective. Thus there exists an element $e$ of $G$ such that $f(e)=a$, i.e. $a=ae$.

We want to show that $e$ is in fact a two-sided identity for $G$. So let $b$ be an arbitrary element of $G$, and consider $ab=(ae)b=a(eb)$. Thus by (2), $b=eb$ for all $b$, i.e. $e$ is a left identity. To show $e$ is also a right identity, consider $bb=b(eb)=(be)b$, and apply (3) to conclude that $b=be$.

Now we need to show the existence of inverses. As above, for every $a$ in $G$ the function $g \mapsto ag$ is surjective, so there is an element, $a_R$ say, such that $aa_R=e$. Similarly, there is an element $a_L$ such that $a_La=e$. Since $a_L=a_Le=a_L(aa_R)=(a_La)a_R=ea_R=a_R$, we have that $a_L=a_R$ is a two-sided inverse for $a$.

share|improve this answer
@Chris_Eagle how do you know it must be surjective? – Allison Cameron Sep 26 '12 at 20:27
1  
A map of a finite set to itself is is either bijective or it is neither in- nor surjective. – Hagen von Eitzen Sep 26 '12 at 20:30
1  
By the way, it is sufficient to show that just a left inverse and a left identity exists. – peoplepower Sep 26 '12 at 21:20
@peoplepower: That result is rather trickier to prove than this one, though, so it seemed silly to rely on it. – Chris Eagle Sep 27 '12 at 6:40
@ChrisEagle: True. The second inverse trick is hard to see when you don't know it. – peoplepower Sep 27 '12 at 12:00

The finiteness of $G$ will let us use the pigeonhole principle to say for some $a\in G$ that there is some $e_a\in G$ such that $a*e_a=a$. Using the associativity of $*$, then $(b*a)*e_a=b*(a*e_a)=b*a$, and by pigeonhole principle, every $c\in G$ has form $b*a$ for some $b\in G$ so that $e_a$ is a right identity element.

Now, take any $b,c\in G$ and note that $b*c=(b*e_a)*c=b*(e_a*c)$, so by cancellativity, $c=e_a*c$ for any $c\in G$. Thus, $e_a$ is a left identity element, as well.

Cancellativity tells us that $e_a$ is (in fact) the unique identity element of $G$. A final (similar) application of pigeonhole principle and cancellativity tells us that for any $b\in G$, there is a unique $c\in G$ such that $c*b=e_a=b*c$.

share|improve this answer

Given $g \in G$, by finiteness of $G$ and condition $2$, left multiplication $l_g : G \to G$ by $g$ is a permutation of $G$. Then, by associativity of $*$, the map $g \mapsto l_g$ is a magma homomorphism. By condition $3$, this map is an injection. Thus, the magma $G$ can be embedded into $S_{|G|}$. Since any nonempty subset of any finite group, which is closed under multiplication is a subgroup, $G$ is a subgroup of $S_{|G|}$.

This proof also shows that we can weaken the right cancellation hypothesis with: If $g$, $h \in G$ satisfy $gx = hx$ for all $x \in G$, then $g = h$.

share|improve this answer

Your three axioms do not describe a group but rather a semigroup with cancellation law. An example of such a beast is the set $\mathbb N$ with addition. It is not a group.

However, you additionally require finiteness. To show that $(G,*)$ is now a group, consider the following: Select $a\in G$ and define $a^n$ recursively: $a^1=a$, $a^{n+1}=a^n*a$. Finiteness implies that $a^n=a^m$ for some $n\ne m$ . Wlog. $n>m$, say $n=m+k$ with $k>0$. Then $a^{k+1}*a^{m}=a^{n+1}=a^n*a=a^m*a=a^{m+1}=a*a^{m}$, hence $a^{k+1}=a$. Let $e=a^{k}$. Then $e*a=a*e=a^{k+1}=a$. Let $x\in G$. Since the $x* y$, $y\in G$ are pairwise distinct, there is one $y$ with $x* y = a$. It follows that $$ (e*x)*y = e*(x*y) = e*a = a = x*y,$$ hence $e*x=x$. Since the $z*x$, $z\in G$ are pairwise distinct, there is one $z$ with $z*x = a$. It follows that $$ z*(x*e)=(z*x)*e=a*e=a=z*x,$$ hence $x*e=x$. Thus $e$ is left and right neutral.

Then, again by the $x* y$ being distinct, we find $y\in G$ such that $x*y=e$. But then also $(y*x)*y=y*(x*y)=y*e=y=e*y$ implies $y*x=e$, i.e. th e$y$ found is left and right inverse of $x$.

share|improve this answer
3  
You missed the finiteness assumption. – Chris Eagle Sep 26 '12 at 20:09
Yes I did - and thenlost time ;) – Hagen von Eitzen Sep 26 '12 at 20:32

Beginning: fix an element $a.$ Taking all $x,$ the set of right products $ax$ will be the entire set (they are distinct and the set is finite, we count), so there is some $x,$ call it $x_a$ such that $a x_a = a.$ Next, there is some $y_a$ such that $y_a a = a. $ There is more work after this.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.