Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have recently asked a question related to an inverse function which was not so obvious to calculate:

Inverse function of $y=W(e^{ax+b})-W(e^{cx+d})+zx$

Now I would like to learn;

Given $$f(x)=f_1(x)+f_2(x)$$

What are the conditions imposed on $f_1$ and $f_2$ such that


and when is such an approximation is not good at all?

Thanks alot in advance-

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Well that would mean $x = f_1^{-1}\left(f_1(x)+f_2(x)\right) + f_2^{-1}\left(f_1(x)+f_2(x)\right)$ so it'd really be strange.

Assuming there are solution, the set of all solutions $S$: $$S = \left\{ ( f_1, f_2 ) \in \left( \mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{R}} \right)^2, f_1 : \mathbb{R} \leftrightarrow \mathbb{R}, f_2 : \mathbb{R} \leftrightarrow \mathbb{R}, {f}^{-1}(x)={f_1}^{-1}(x)+{f_2}^{-1}(x) \right\}$$

The neutral element for $+$ would be $( x \mapsto 0, x \mapsto 0 )$ but $x \mapsto 0$ isn't bijective so it can't be in a pair of your set.

The neutral element for $\times$ would be $( x \mapsto 1, x \mapsto 1 )$ but $x \mapsto 1$ isn't bijective so it can't be in a pair of your set.

The neutral element for $\circ$ would be $( x \mapsto x, x \mapsto x )$ but $\frac{1}{2}x \not= x + x$ so it's not in the set either.

So the set would be unlikely to have any interesting properties and you probably wouldn't be able to determine if a function is in the set before calculating its inverse, making it completely useless...

share|cite|improve this answer
how did you get your first equation? – Seyhmus Güngören Sep 26 '12 at 20:28
I replaced $x$ by $f(x)$ in your second equation so I got $f^{-1}(f(x))=x$ on the left side and on the right side, I did the same thing with the right members of your equations (which means I did the same thing and then used your first equation to replace $f(x)$). – xavierm02 Sep 26 '12 at 21:45
I see and what are the next steps? what are $+,\times ,o$? $(x\rightarrow 0,x\rightarrow 0)$? Is it possible to give more details as I dont understand what you mean. – Seyhmus Güngören Sep 26 '12 at 22:03
Well assuming you did have solutions, you would be able to put all those solutions in a set. Then, you would want to know properties of that set. Such as $\left(x,y\right) \in S^2 \implies x + y \in S$. I checked if $(S, +)$, $(S, \times)$ or $(S, \circ)$ was a group. And none of these 3 is since it would have to contain the neutral element for the operation. – xavierm02 Sep 27 '12 at 17:59

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.