Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A nonsingular matrix is one which is invertible, and hence the determinant is not equal to $0$. So at first I thought about having $\det(A_{1})+\det(A_{2})=\det(A_{1}+A_{2})$ and then the resulting sum being a invertible matrix, but this is not generally the case. Then I thought about eigenvalues, as the determinant is the product of the eigenvalues and that using that I could showing that the spectrum of the sum is equal to the sum of the spectrums.

Is that a better way?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 7 down vote accepted

Suppose that $\alpha\ne 0$ is not an eigenvalue of $A$. Then for any non-zero $v$ we have $(A-\alpha I)v\ne 0$, so $A-\alpha I$ is non-singular. So is $\alpha I$, and $A=(A-\alpha I)+\alpha I$.

share|cite|improve this answer
First, I have seen $(A-\alpha*I)V\neq0$ and also $(\alpha*I-A)v\neq=0$ Is there a difference in values or should I view it like absolute values? Also, would using $\alpha*I$ count as a trivial case? – Edgar Aroutiounian Sep 26 '12 at 1:28
@Edgar: The vectors $(A-\alpha I)v$ and $(\alpha I-A)v$ are additive inverses of each other, so in general they’re not the same, but if one is $0$, then so is the other. Whether $\alpha I$ counts as a trivial case depends on context: there’s no absolute definition of trivial here. (To get $\alpha I$, just leave a space between \alpha and I.) – Brian M. Scott Sep 26 '12 at 1:31
thank you for your help! – Edgar Aroutiounian Sep 26 '12 at 1:34
@Edgar: My pleasure! – Brian M. Scott Sep 26 '12 at 1:36

Write $A=L+U$ where $L$ is lower triangular, $U$ is upper triangular. $L$ and $U$ have the same diagonal, equal to half the diagonal of $A$, except where zeros appear. In this case, use $1$ in $L$ and $-1$ in $U$. This makes the diagonals of $U$ and $L$ have no zero entries and so $L$ and $U$ are nonsingular.

share|cite|improve this answer
This works over any field of characteristic $\ne 2$, and with a tiny modification also works for every field except $\mathbb F_2$. – Erick Wong Mar 19 '15 at 6:22

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.