Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Would anyone like to help me complete this proof? I need some help understanding where to go next. The book is giving me hints and I am trying to follow along, but I am getting confused about how to finish.

Let $c$ be irrational with $0<c<1$. Let $x_n=nc-[ nc] =nc \mod 1$, with $[nc]$ meaning $\operatorname{floor}(nc)$. Determine the cluster points of the sequence $x_n$.

Let $\varepsilon>0$

Ok, so first I prove that $x_n=x_m$ implies $n=m$, which is easy, since $c$ is irrational. So every $x_n$ is unique.

Secondly, I can use the Archimedian property to pick $m$ such that $\frac1m < \varepsilon$ . Then I can divide up the interval $[0,1)$ into $m$ pieces like this: for $1 \leq k \leq m$ I can let $I_k=\left[\frac{k-1}m,\frac km\right)$.

Now I can take $\{{x_j : j=1, N+1, 2N+1,\ldots,mN+1}\}$ , which has $m+1$ distinct values, and thus by the pigeonhole principle, there must be $x_j$ and $x_{j'}$ that are both in the same $I_k$ and hence $|x_j-x_{j'}|<\varepsilon$.

So here I am not sure where to go now. Would anyone care to help me out? I am trying to find the cluster points.

share|improve this question
You can get $\epsilon$ with \epsilon and the rest of the Greek alphabet similarly. Also, to get the prime on the subscript of $x_j$, put it in braces: x_{j'} gives $x_{j'}$ –  Ross Millikan Sep 25 '12 at 19:49
Why did you erase your question a few minutes ago? It's nice to have an archive of old questions, in case someone in the future has a similar question. –  Snowball Sep 25 '12 at 21:35
@Erica Please stop vandalizing your questions. This behavior violates the norms of MSE. If it continues your account may be suspended. –  Bill Dubuque Oct 13 '12 at 0:32
add comment

2 Answers

Step 1. Show that $\inf_{n\in\mathbb N}x_n=0$.

Proof. Assume that $\inf_{n\in\mathbb N}x_n=a>0$.

Case I. There is an $n$, such that $x_n=a$, but as $[1/a]a<1<[1/a]a+a$, then $$ 0<(1+[1/a])a-1<a. $$ Thus for $k=1+[1/a]$ $$ x_{kn}=(1+[1/a])a-1<a, $$ which contradicts the assumption that $\inf_{n\in\mathbb N}x_n=a$.

Case II. For every $\varepsilon>0$, there exists an $n$, such that $a<x_n<a+\varepsilon$. In that case we can find $m>n$, such that $$ a<x_m<x_n<2a, $$ and if $b=x_n-x_m$, then $0<b<a$, and if $\ell=[x_m/b]$ and $j=m-n$, we have that $$ x_{m+\ell j}=x_m-\ell b<b<a, $$ which is again a contradiction. That $\inf_{n\in\mathbb N}x_n=0$.

Step 2. For every $0\le c<d\le 1$ there exists an $n$, such that $x_n\in[c,d]$.

Proof. if $c=0$, it is straightforward from Step 1. Otherwise, let $\varepsilon=\min\{c,d-c\}$. Then let $x_n<\varepsilon$. Clearly, some multiple of $x_n$ lies in $[c,d]$, i.e., $kx_m\in[c,d]$. But $kx_m=x_{km}$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

The cluster points are all points of $[0,1]$. Given a particular point $a$, an $\epsilon \gt 0$ and a number $N$, you need to show that there is an $n \gt N$ that has $|x_n-a|\lt \epsilon$. Once you find $x_j$ and $x_{j'}$ with $|x_j - x_{j'}| \lt \epsilon$, any time you add $j-j'$ to the subscript, it steps by that amount. If you keep doing these steps, one of them will land within $\epsilon$ of $a$.

share|improve this answer
Why will they be close to $a$? –  Berci Sep 25 '12 at 19:54
They step through the interval in steps smaller than $\epsilon$, so one of them will land close to $a$. Then around again and you will again land close to $a$, so there are points close to $a$ at arbitrarily high index, which is a cluster point. –  Ross Millikan Sep 25 '12 at 20:10
I totally understand what you are saying! How would I write it rigorously, though? –  Erica McDonald Sep 25 '12 at 20:48
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.