Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given $\lim_{n \to \infty}a_n = L$ and $\lim_{n \to \infty}b_n = M$ implies that $\lim_{n \to \infty}2a_n + 3b_n = 2L + 3M$


Assume $\lim_{n \to \infty}a_n = L$ and $\lim_{n \to \infty}b_n = M$ and $\forall \epsilon > 0$, we have $\frac{\epsilon}{4}>0$ and $\frac{\epsilon}{6}>0$

$|a_n - L| < \frac{\epsilon}{4}$ when $n > N_1$

$|b_n - M| < \frac{\epsilon}{6}$ when $n > N_2$

Set $n>N= \max \left \{ N_1, N_2 \right \}$,we have

$|2a_n + 3b_n - (2L + 3M)| \leq |2a_n - 2L| + |3b_n - 3M| = |2||a_n - L| + |3||b_n - M| < 2\frac{\epsilon}{4} + 3\frac{\epsilon}{6} = \epsilon$

Question: I had to work backwards to choose my $\epsilon$, is that a "general" strategy? I omitted my work for finding my $\epsilon$

share|cite|improve this question
Perfect, almost too much so. You worked too hard in working backwards. I would have picked $\frac{\epsilon}{100}$ for both, then we get $\le \frac{2\epsilon}{100}+\frac{3\epsilon}{100}=\frac{5\epsilon}{100}\lt \epsilon$. – André Nicolas Sep 25 '12 at 18:15
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Yes, this looks correct. Working backwards to choose $\epsilon$ is also the strategy I'd recommend in general.

share|cite|improve this answer
But I've noticed that in my proof class that if we "include" the work of working backwards (with step-by-step explanation) then it is considered informal – Hawk Sep 25 '12 at 19:39
@jak It usually isn't included, but I wouldn't say it makes the proof "informal" in the sense I use the word (i.e. the proof is no less technically complete and correct). – Alex Becker Sep 25 '12 at 19:42
I asked because most books omit that important work. It took me a while to understand this concept. Thank you very much – Hawk Sep 25 '12 at 19:44

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.