Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

How do I prove that dot product of two free vectors ( inner product in 2D and 3D vectors) does not depend on the choice of frames in which their coordinates are defined?

share|improve this question
    
1) What do you mean by a "frame" ? 2) What do you mean by a "dot" product? –  Braindead Feb 3 '11 at 11:26
    
frame = basis (it's a more physical terminology) and dot product is scalar product. –  Raskolnikov Feb 3 '11 at 11:47
    
You should state what definition of dot product you are using. –  Eric O. Korman Feb 3 '11 at 12:49
    
3) What do you mean by a 'free vector'? –  wildildildlife Feb 3 '11 at 14:52
    
probably linearly independent, and frame probably means orthonormal basis. –  Soarer Feb 3 '11 at 15:05

2 Answers 2

Since I guess it's homework, I'll just give a hint. A change of basis (or 'frame') is a linear mapping, i.e. applying an certain matrix $A$, sending each vector $v \mapsto A.v.$ What properties does $A$ have?

share|improve this answer
    
Yes, indeed it is a HW problem. And A can be a Rotational Matrix –  Ender Feb 4 '11 at 0:58

The dot-product is in the first place a bilinear function of two vector variables with the additional property that ${\bf x}\bullet{\bf x}>0$ for ${\bf x}\ne{\bf 0}$. For any basis $({\bf e}_i)_{1\leq i\leq n}$ of your space the dot-product is encoded in a certain symmetric matrix $G:=(g_{ik})_{1\leq i\leq n,1\leq k\leq n}$. This matrix changes with the basis in a characteristic way. When a dot product is given then there are certain distinguished bases, namely the orthonormal ones. For these the matrix $G$ is just the identity matrix, and in the corresponding coordinates the dot-product computes as $(*)\ {\bf x}\bullet{\bf y} =\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i$. In particular, if one starts with the "standard space" ${\mathbb R}^n$ then the standard basis is considered orthonormal, whence one has the standard formula $(*)$ there.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.