Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $f:X \rightarrow Y$ be a map and let $Y$ be a ringed space, i.e. we have a sheaf of rings $O_Y$. Suppose that the regular functions are $k$-valued functions, where $k$ is a field. Define the open sets of $X$ to be generated by inverse images of open sets of $Y$. We want to give $X$ a ringed space structure. One way is to consider the inverse image sheaf. Another way is to define a function $g$ on $U$ to be regular, where $U$ is open in $X$, whenever there exists a covering $U \subseteq \cup_{a} f^{-1}(V_a)$ and regular functions of $Y$, $g_a : V_a \rightarrow k$, such that $g|_{U \cap f^{-1}(V_a)} = (g_a \circ f)|_{U \cap f^{-1}(V_a)}, \, \forall a$. Are the two constructions equivalent?

share|cite|improve this question
You shouldn't think of sections of the structure sheaf as regular "functions" with some specified codomain – in scheme theory, for example, this fails. – Zhen Lin Sep 25 '12 at 5:04
up vote 0 down vote accepted

I ended up asking somebody in person, very known in algebraic geometry, and the two sheaf structures, i.e. the inverse image sheaf and the so called "induced structure" not only they are not equivalent, but very rarely coincide.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.