Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I need to show that these generated $\sigma$-algebras are the same:

$F_1 = \sigma(\{[a,b) : -\infty<a<b<\infty \}) $

$F_2 = \sigma(\{(-\infty , x] :x \in \mathbb{R} \})$

I am not sure, but my idea thus far:

  1. Show that every interval $[a,b)$ is an element of $\{(-\infty , x) :x \in \mathbb{R} \}$.
  2. Show that every interval $(-\infty , x]$ is an element of $\{[a,b) : -\infty<a<b<\infty \}$.

If my idea is right (please tell me if I'm wrong), I am having trouble trying to express some things. For example, I want to show that I can choose an $a$ and a $b$ such that I get the open interval $(x,\infty)$, a complement of an element expressed in $\{(-\infty , x) :x \in \mathbb{R} \}$. Does it make sense to say something like $a=x+\epsilon : \epsilon \rightarrow 0$ and $lim_{n\rightarrow{}\infty}b_n = \infty$? I am not sure if I am expressing that $a$ approaches a number $x$, and that $b$ approaches $\infty$!

Thanks!

share|improve this question
1  
You need to add $\sigma$ in your two statements to make them correct! Note the difference between a collection of sets such as $\{(-\infty,x]:x\in\Bbb R\}$ and the $\sigma$-algebra that they generate. –  Per Manne Sep 24 '12 at 8:54
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 0 down vote accepted

To answer your last question, you cannot use limits directly in the fashion that you seem to be suggesting, but you can take countable unions, which $-$ if done right $-$ can have the same effect.

Neither of your statements (1) and (2) is correct, so both will be rather hard to prove! Try instead to show that each interval $[a,b)\in F_2$ and each interval $(\leftarrow,a]\in F_1$: that immediately implies that $F_1=F_2$.

Here’s a sequence of steps that will take care of one direction; remember that a $\sigma$-algebra is closed under both countable unions and complementation.

  1. Show that each interval $(\leftarrow,a)\in F_2$.
  2. Show that each interval $[a,\to)\in F_2$.
  3. Show that each interval $[a,b)\in F_2$.

For the other direction:

  1. Show that each interval $[a,b]$ with $a<b$ is in $F_1$.
  2. Show that each interval $(\leftarrow,a]\in F_1$.
share|improve this answer
    
Oh, yes... I guess this is where I employ my newly learned "up-arrows" and "down-arrows": $a_n\downarrow{}a$? –  ialm Sep 24 '12 at 7:28
    
@iakl: Sounds good to me. –  Brian M. Scott Sep 24 '12 at 7:29
    
Also, for your first point under "For the other direction", why do I have to show that the interval $[a,b]$ is in $F_1$? –  ialm Sep 24 '12 at 7:32
    
@iakl: The first way that I saw to show that $(\leftarrow,a]\in F_1$ is to show first that all non-trivial intervals of the form $[a,b]$ are in $F_1$. There are other ways, but that was what immediately occurred to me. –  Brian M. Scott Sep 24 '12 at 7:38
    
Thank you very much for your help, I think I am starting to get the idea. –  ialm Sep 24 '12 at 7:40
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.