Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A cookery related article I want to refer to mentions a "7 log10 relative reduction of salmonella". A few related sources suggest this evaluates to 10,000,000, although I would have imagined that 107 is the usual way of expressing this.

I initially thought that I should interpret this as log10(7) but that doesn't seem right given that an 85% reduction in salmonella can hardly be considered safe.

If the first interpretation is correct, could someone tell me why it might have been expressed this way, rather than as a power of 10?

share|cite|improve this question
could this perhaps be better asked on Seasoned Advice/Cooking.SE? – Lie Ryan Sep 22 '12 at 13:26
up vote 1 down vote accepted

According to this page a 7 log reduction is a reduction in number of microorganisms by 10000000-fold (so $10^7$). It seems like this is something that is often used in food science.

So I guess that the basic idea is that if you draw the relationship between cooking time needed for a certain reduction in organisms and the time, then you get a logarithmic relationship, so maybe that is why they chose to use the log notation to emphasize this fact.

There is more about this log-reduction here or here.

share|cite|improve this answer

Notice that:

$$ \log_{10} (10,000,000)=7$$

So instead of writing the 1 followed by 7 zeros, that (strange) notation ($7\log_{10}$) might have been used instead. Of course there are other more common notations such as the power and the E.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.