Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If $A∈M(n;\mathbb{R})$, let $A^t$ denote its transpose. A matrix $S\in M(n;\mathbb{R})$ is said to be skew-symmetric if $S^t = −S$. Pick out the true statements:

a. If S ∈ $M(n;\mathbb{R})$ is skew-symmetric and non-singular, then $n$ is even.

b. Let $G = \{T ∈ GL(n;\mathbb{R})\mid T^t ST = S$, for all skew-symmetric $S ∈ M(n;\mathbb{R}$}. Then $G$ is a subgroup of $GL(n;\mathbb{R})$.

c. Let $I_n$ and $O_n$ denote the $n \times n$ identity and null matrices respectively. Let $S$ be the $2n \times 2n$ matrix given in block form by $\left[\matrix{O_n&I_n\cr -I_n&O_n}\right]$.

If $X$ is a $2n×2n$ matrix such that $X^t S+SX = 0$, then the trace of $X$ is zero.

Please help anyone to solve the problem. My thinking as far:- (a) is true as every skew symmetric matrix of odd order is singular. For(b) & (c) no idea. Thanks.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

(a) Note Aaron's hint (that $\det(A^t)=\det(A)$) and remember that $\det(\alpha A)=\alpha^n \det(A)$ for all $\alpha\in\mathbb{R}$.
(b) Remember that for $T\in\rm{GL}_n(\mathbb{R})$ we have $\left(T^{-1}\right)^t=\left(T^t\right)^{-1}$ and that for all $A,B\in \rm{M}_n(\mathbb{R})$, $B^tA^t=(AB)^t$. Now check the group axioms.
(c) What is $S^{-1}$? You can find it by checking smaller examples. What is $SXS^{-1}$? Compute this using small examples as well.

share|cite|improve this answer
Could you give more hints for $c$... I see that $S^{-1}=\begin{bmatrix} 0&-I_n\\I_n&0 \end{bmatrix}$ and $SXS^{-1}=-X^t$.. but then it does not say anything except that Trace of $X$ is same as that of $SXS^{-1}$... could you please extend your hint – Praphulla Koushik Jan 8 '14 at 3:26
@Praphulla Koushik: It means that $\operatorname{trace}(X)=\operatorname{trace}(SXS^{-1})=\operatorname{trace}(-X^‌​{t})=-\operatorname{trace}(X)$. Then... – Dennis Gulko Jan 8 '14 at 12:39
but i do not have $X=SXS^{-1}$ so.. i do not understand the concussion $\operatorname{trace}(X)=\operatorname{trace}(SXS^{-1})$ remaining this are fine... – Praphulla Koushik Jan 8 '14 at 12:45
I now understand why $\operatorname{trace}(X)=\operatorname{trace}(SXS^{-1})$ thank you :) – Praphulla Koushik Jan 9 '14 at 2:12

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.