Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $X=\{(x,0)\in \mathbb{R}^2\,|\,x \in \mathbb{R}\} \cup \{(0,1)\}$, give $(0,1)$ the name "$a$", and let $T=\{A\subseteq X\,|\,a \in A\} \cup \{\emptyset\}$. Is $(X,T)$ path-connected?

I believe it is, and here is why:

Let $f:[0,1] \to X$ be such that $f(0)=x$ and $f(1)=a$, where $x \in X\setminus \{a\}$ (of course the constant map to $a$ is continuous). Then $f([0,1])=\{a\}\cup X_0$ where $X_0$ is closed (does not contain $a$). Then we have $f^{-1}(\{a\}\cup X_0) = f^{-1}(\{a\}) \cup f^{-1}(X_0)$. Since $\{a\}$ is open we must have $f^{-1}(\{a\})$ of the form $(a_0,1]$ (this is open in the subspace topology). Since $X_0$ is closed we must then have $f^{-1}(X_0) = [0,a_0]$. So $f^{-1}(\{a\} \cup X_0) = [0,1]$. I don't see any contradiction in this, so is it true that $X$ is path-connected?

I worked this out because intuitively the space seems not to be path-connected but is due to the topology (if I'm correct). Is there a non-discrete topology on $X$ that makes it non-path-connected?

share|improve this question
1  
Of course there's a non-discrete topology on $X$ which makes it path-disconnected: the subspace topology from $\mathbb R^2$. Although for any set with more than $2$ points there is a non-discrete topology which makes the set disconnected (hence path-disconnected). –  Alex Becker Sep 21 '12 at 3:39
2  
$\bf R$ is not a subset of ${\bf R}^2$. Perhaps when you wrote $\bf R$ you meant the set of points of the form $(r,0)$. –  Gerry Myerson Sep 21 '12 at 3:52
    
First sentence edited according to comments. –  Alex Petzke Sep 21 '12 at 12:58

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

I’m going to assume that ‘$\subseteq\Bbb R^2$’ in the definition of $X$ was simply an error. (If you really want $X$ to be a subset of the plane, follow Gerry Myerson’s suggestion and replace $\Bbb R$ by $\{\langle x,0\rangle:x\in\Bbb R\}$.)

Suppose that $f:[0,1]\to X$ is continuous and $f(1)=a$. Let $A=\{t\in[0,1]:f(t)=1\}$; the set $\{a\}$ is open in $X$, so $A$ must be open in $[0,1]$. Now suppose further that $f(0)=x\ne a$, and let $Z=\{t\in[0,1]:f(t)=x\}$. The set $\{x,a\}$ is open in $X$, so $f^{-1}[A]=Z\cup A$ must be open in $[0,1]$. Suppose that we let $f(t)=a$ for all $t\in(0,1]$, so that $Z=\{0\}$ and $A=(0,1]$; that definitely makes $f$ continuous at $0$ and at $1$, and it’s easy to check that for any open set $U$ in $X$, $f^{-1}[U]$ is either $\varnothing$ (if $U\varnothing$), $(0,1]$(if $x\notin U$), or $[0,1]$ (if $x\in U$). Thus, $f$ is continuous, and you’ve shown that there’s a path from $x$ to $a$. It follows easily by concatenating paths that $X$ is path-connected.

As was pointed out in the comments, if you replace $\Bbb R$ by the $x$-axis and topologize $X$ as a subspace of $\Bbb R^2$, you get a very nice non-discrete topology on $X$ in which $X$ is not path-connected.

share|improve this answer
    
So what was wrong with what I had, if anything? –  Alex Petzke Sep 21 '12 at 13:19
    
@Alex: Not a thing. I should have said so, but I dashed that off in a hurry and forgot. –  Brian M. Scott Sep 21 '12 at 19:38
    
Got it. Thanks for the answer. –  Alex Petzke Sep 21 '12 at 21:17

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.