Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The following theorem appears in "Princeton Lectures in Analysis, Complex Analysis," by Stein & Shakarchi:

Suppose $\{F_n\}$ is a sequence of holomorphic functions on the open set $\Omega$.
If there exists constants $c_n \gt 0$ s.t. $\sum c_n < \infty$ and $|F_n(z) - 1| \le c_n$, for all $z \in \Omega$, then
The product $\prod_{n=1}^\infty F_n(z)$ converges uniformly in $\Omega$ to a holomorphic function $F(z)$

The idea is that we can write $\prod_{n=1}^N F_n(z)$ as $\prod_{n=1}^Ne^{\text{log}F_n(z)} = e^{\sum_{n=1}^N\text{log}F_n(z)}$
Using the fact that $|\text{log} f| \le 2|f-1|$ for $f$ close enough to $1$, together with $|F_n(z) - 1| \le c_n$ and $\sum c_n < \infty$, it follows that $e^{\sum_{n=1}^N\text{log}F_n(z)}$ converges to some function $F(z)$,
but how do we know that it converges uniformly?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Hint: bound $\left|\sum_{n=M}^N \log F_n(z)\right|$

share|improve this answer
    
I may have some clue at what you're getting at. So I want to write $e^{\sum_{n=1}^{M-1}\text{log}F_n}e^{\sum_{n=M}^{N}\text{log}F_n}$ and then I can show that the second exponential term is close to $1$. But that only allows me to get within a multiplicative constant of my limit function, not an additive constant, right? –  Mark Sep 20 '12 at 1:52
    
If the function is bounded, a multiplicative factor is as good as an additive one. –  Robert Israel Sep 20 '12 at 7:46
    
That's a great point! –  Mark Oct 5 '12 at 2:24
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.