Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am reading Detection and Estimation by Kay. In problem 2.7, one of the parts is to show that the maximum eigenvalue of the autocorrelation matrix is less than the maximum value of the PSD.

The autocorrelation matrix for a wide-sense stationary signal $X$ is defined as $$ \mathbf{R} = \begin{bmatrix} r_{xx}(0) & r_{xx}(1) & \cdots & r_{xx}(N-1) \\ r_{xx}(1) & r_{xx}(0) & \cdots & r_{xx}(N-2) \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ r_{xx}(N-1) & r_{xx}(N-2) & \cdots & r_{xx}(0) \end{bmatrix}. $$

The PSD, $P_{xx}(f)$, is defined as: \begin{align*} P_{xx}(f) & = \sum_{k = -\infty}^{+\infty} r_{xx}(k) \exp(-j2\pi fk) \\ & = \sum_{k = -(N-1)}^{N-1} r_{xx}(k) \exp(-j2\pi fk) \end{align*} where $j = \sqrt{-1}$.

The following statement uses the Rayleigh quotient:

$$ \lambda_{\text{MAX}} = \max_{\mathbf{u}} \frac{\mathbf{u}^T \mathbf{R} \mathbf{u}}{\mathbf{u}^T \mathbf{u}} $$ where $\lambda_{\text{MAX}}$ represents the largest eigenvalue of the matrix $\mathbf{R}$. It turns out the equation for $\lambda_{\text{MAX}}$ can also be expressed in another form, after using $\mathbf{u}^T \mathbf{R} \mathbf{u} = \int_{-1/2}^{1/2} |U(f)|^2 P_{xx}(f) \, \mathrm{d}f$ in the numerator and $\mathbf{u}^T \mathbf{u} = \int_{-1/2}^{1/2} |U(f)|^2 \, \mathrm{d}f$ in the denominator. Finally,

$$ \lambda_{\text{MAX}} = \max_{\mathbf{u}} \frac{\mathbf{u}^T \mathbf{R} \mathbf{u}}{\mathbf{u^T} \mathbf{u}} = \frac{\int_{-\frac12}^{\frac12} |U(f)|^2 P_{xx}(f)\, \mathrm{d}f}{\int_{-\frac12}^{\frac12} |U(f)|^2 \, \mathrm{d}f} $$

From the last equation, I am supposed to be able to show $\lambda_{\text{MAX}} < P_{xx}(f)_{\text{MAX}}$, where $P_{xx}(f)_{\text{MAX}}$ is the maximum value of $P_{xx}(f)$. How am I supposed to show that? It appears the numerator (and denominator) is a function of the vector $\mathbf{u}$. The variable $f$ disappears after integration is performed.

share|improve this question
    
I think there may an argument where in the maximization of the fraction, the vector $\mathbf{u}$ will "fill up" where-ever $P_xx(f)$ is larger. I'm somewhat curious how this would work without constraints on $\mathbf{u}$. –  jrand Sep 19 '12 at 4:05

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

The answer is easy: Since $\lvert U(f)\rvert^2 P_{xx}(f) \leq \lvert U(f) \rvert^2 P_{xx}(f)_{max}$, monotonicity of the integral implies $$ \begin{align} \int_{-\frac12}^{+\frac12} \lvert U(f) \rvert^2 P_{xx}(f)\,\mathrm{d}f &\leq \int_{-\frac12}^{+\frac12} \lvert U(f) \rvert^2 P_{xx}(f)_{max}\,\mathrm{d}f\\ &= P_{xx}(f)_{max} \int_{-\frac12}^{+\frac12} \lvert U(f) \rvert^2\,\mathrm{d}f \end{align} $$

Note that $P_{xx}(f)_{max}$ is simply a constant that can be taken out of the integral. Thus, $$ \underbrace{\frac{\int_{-\frac12}^{+\frac12} |U(f)|^2 P_{xx}(f)\,\mathrm{d}f}{\int_{-\frac12}^{+\frac12} |U(f)|^2\,\mathrm{d}f}}_{\substack{\text{True for any $u$.} \\ \text{Suppose $u$ is set so that this quantity is maximized.}}} \leq P_{xx}(f)_{max} $$

Then, $$ \lambda_{MAX} = \max_u \frac{\int_{-\frac12}^{+\frac12} |U(f)|^2 P_{xx}(f)\,\mathrm{d}f}{\int_{-\frac12}^{+\frac12} |U(f)|^2\,\mathrm{d}f} \leq P_{xx}(f)_{max} $$ That's all.

share|improve this answer
1  
Hi: please take some time to pick up the basics of latex typesetting in the editor. This answer is currently very difficult to read, and it would benefit a lot from proper typesetting. –  rschwieb Apr 23 '13 at 14:48
    
Welcome to math.SE: I have tried to improve the readability of your question by introducing Tex. It is possible that I unintentionally changed the meaning of your question. Please proofread the question to ensure this has not happened. –  A.P. Apr 23 '13 at 15:01

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.