Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $u(x)$ be a real function with the properties

  • $u(x)$ is continuous and non-decreasing in $x$
  • $u'(x)$ is non-increasing in $x$
  • $u(0)=0$
  • $u'(0)=1$.

In other words, $u(x)$ is a utility function.

In a rather old insurance paper the series on the left hand side of $$\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{\lambda^k}{k!}u(-\lambda u(-z)-zk)=0,$$ where $z>0$ and $\lambda>0$, is differentiated with respect to $\lambda$ rather non-chalantly and without further comment by differentiation of every summand, i.e differentiation and summation are exchanged. Is the uniform convergence of the series consisting of the derivatives of the summands, i.e $$\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \left(\frac{\lambda^{k-1}}{(k-1)!}u(-\lambda u(-z)-zk)-\frac{\lambda^k}{k!}u'(-\lambda u(-z)-zk)u(-z)\right),$$ needed for this exchange to work really that easy to see? To be more specific, how would such a general series be approached?

share|improve this question
    
differentiation is a linear operator and summation as well...as I see it, you can exchange it with no problem. –  Cristian Sep 18 '12 at 17:09
    
@Cristian Not true, Weierstrass M-test or showing series is cauchy is only thing that comes to mind. But I don't see it working unless $\lambda$ has some constraint. –  Stuart Sep 18 '12 at 17:12
    
@Mycroft does your original eq holds as an identity for $\lambda>0$? –  Cristian Sep 18 '12 at 17:23
    
@Cristian It does. –  hpschrei Sep 18 '12 at 17:35
    
@Mycroft then, should the derivative of the lhs be equal to the derivative of the rhs implying that the sum of derivatives wrt $\lambda$ is zero? –  Cristian Sep 18 '12 at 18:44

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.