Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've been reading about compactifications, and I encountered a theorem about the Cech-Stone compactification. I've seen the proof of this theorem in other textbooks, but difference definitions and constructions were used. In this text, they give the definition of a compactification, and then the Cech-Stone compactification of a completely regular space $X$ is defined as the compactification which is maximal in the $\leq$ ordering. The $\leq$ ordering on the family of compactifications on $X$ is defined as: $cX \leq dX$ if and only if there is a continuous and onto $f:dX \rightarrow cX$ which fixes all points in $X$.

Theorem: The Cech-Stone compactification exists for every completely regular space $X$.

They provide a sketch of the proof, but I am having trouble filling in the gaps.

Sketch of Proof: Let $\mathcal{C}_{X}$ be the set of all compactifications on $X$, then $\prod \mathcal{C}_{X}$ is a compact space. Embed $X$ into $\prod \mathcal{C}_{X}$ by $\phi$: $x \mapsto \{ c(x) : cX \in \mathcal{C}_X \}$. Then, the closure of this image of $X$ is as required.

I don't understand why the mapping is an embedding. Also, I'm having trouble understanding why the closure of the image of $X$ ends up being the Cech-Stone compactification.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 7 down vote accepted

There’s a bit of sloppiness right off the bat in the definition of $\mathscr{C}_X$ as the set of all compactifications of $X$: they really mean that $\mathscr{C}_X$ is a set containing one representative of each homeomorphism class of compactifications of $X$. That is, each member of $\mathscr{C}_X$ is a compactification of $X$, and every compactification of $X$ is homeomorphic to exactly one member of $\mathscr{C}_X$. It actually takes a bit of set-theoretic finesse to justify the existence of this set, but never mind; we’ll take all that as read and worry about the topology.

Let $Y=\prod\mathscr{C}_X$, and let $\varphi:X\to Y:x\mapsto\big\langle c(x):cX\in\mathscr{C}_X\big\rangle$. For each $cX\in\mathscr{C}_X$, $c:X\to cX$ is an embedding, so it’s clear that $\varphi$ is an injection. To show that $\varphi$ is continuous, it suffices to show that for each $cX\in\mathscr{C}_X$ and each open set $U$ in $cX$, $\varphi^{-1}\left[\{y\in Y:y_{cX}\in U\}\right]$ is open in $X$, since sets of the form $\{y\in Y:y_{cX}\in U\}$ are a subbase for the product topology on $Y$. But

$$\begin{align*} \varphi^{-1}\left[\{y\in Y:y_{cX}\in U\}\right]&=\{x\in X:c(x)\in U\}\\ &=c^{-1}[U]\\ &=c[X]\cap U\;, \end{align*}$$

which is open in $X$ simply because $cX$ is a compactification of $X$.

(Here $c[X]=\{c(x):x\in X\}\subseteq cX$.)

To show that $\varphi$ is also open, suppose that $U$ is an open set in $X$. then

$$\begin{align*} \varphi[U]&=\{\varphi(x):x\in U\}\\ &=\{\langle c(x):cX\in\mathscr{C}_X\rangle:x\in U\}\\ &=\{\langle c(x):cX\in\mathscr{C}_X\rangle:c(x)\in cU\}\;. \end{align*}$$

If $cX,c'X\in\mathscr{C}_X$ and $x\in X$, $c(x)\in cU$ iff $c'(x)\in c'U$, so $\varphi[U]=\varphi[X]\cap\{y\in Y:y_{cX}\in cU\}$, where $cX$ is a single, fixed compactification of $X$. And $\{y\in Y:y_{cX}\in cU\}$ is a basic open set in the product $Y$, so $\varphi[U]$ is open in $\varphi[X]$. Thus, $\varphi$ maps $x$ homeomorphically to $\varphi[X]$.

Since $Y$ is compact, $\operatorname{cl}_Y\varphi[X]$ is certainly a compactification of $X$; call it $K$. All that’s needed to finish the argument is to show that for each $cX\in\mathscr{C}_X$ there is a continuous surjection $f:K\to cX$ that fixes $X$ pointwise. (Actually, that last bit is verbal sloppiness: what’s really meant is that for each $x\in X$, $f(\varphi(x))=c(x)$.) We can simply take $f$ to be the projection map from $Y$ to the factor $cX$, restricted to the subspace $K$: $f=\pi_{cX}\upharpoonright K$. Projections are always continuous, and $f(\varphi(x))=c(x)$ by the definition of $\varphi$, so we’re done: $K$ is the Čech-Stone compactification of $X$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.