Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose, $S$ is a ring, module-finite over a subring $R$. Let $s_1,...,s_n$ be a minimal set of generators of $S$ as an $R$-module. Can we have, $0=t_1s_1+...+t_ns_n$ for some $t_1,...,t_n\in R$, not all zero?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

In general (and typically) the answer is "yes".

Consider an integral domain $R$ with field of fractions $K$ and an element $x\in K$ which is integral over $R$. Then the ring $S:=R[x]\subseteq K$ is module-finite over $R$.

If $S\neq R$, that is if $x\not\in R$, then as an $R$-module $S$ is generated by at least two elements. Otherwise $S=Ry$ for some $y\in S$. Since $S$ is a ring one gets $y^2=ry$ for some $r\in R$. Consequently $y(y-r)=0$, hence $y\in R$ and thus $R=S$.

A minimal set of generators of $S$ as an $R$-module thus consists of two or more elements. If such a set is linearly independent over $R$, then it is linearly independent over $K$. However a $K$-linearly independent subset of $K$ consists of exactly one element. Consequently every minimal set of generators is linearly dependent over $R$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.