Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose ${f_n}$ are uniformly bounded and equicontinuous on some closed interval $[a,b]$. Therefore, by Arzela-Ascoli we know that $f_n$ has a uniformly convergent subsequence.

But we can also apply Arzela-Ascoli to the subsequences of $f_n$ to get that every subsequence of $f_n$ has a subsequence that converges uniformly. And we have some extra information that says each of the subsequences of subsequences converges uniformly to the same thing.

How do you conclude that $f_n$ converges uniformly from this?

share|improve this question
    
Wait, so every (strict) subsequence of $f_n$ converges uniformly? –  Alex Becker Sep 18 '12 at 0:05
    
Every subsequence has a subsequence which converges uniformly. So that isn't immediate. –  Stuart Sep 18 '12 at 0:14
1  
False even if the functions $f_n$ are constant. –  GEdgar Sep 18 '12 at 0:17
    
To be clear: you are imposing that there is a function $g\in C[0,1]$ so that every subsequence of $(f_n)$ has a further subsequence that converges to $g$ in $C[0,1]$? If so, consider the contrapositive of your claim. –  David Mitra Sep 18 '12 at 0:27
1  
In any topological space if you have a sequence $f_n$ with the property that every subsequence has a further subsequence $f_{n_k}$ which converges to a fixed $f$ in the space, then $f_n$ converges to that $f$. The proof is to observe that if $f_n$ does not converge to $f$ then there is a subsequence which does not ever get 'close' to $f$. But then this subsequence has a subsequence which converges to $f$, which is your contradiction. –  Chris Janjigian Sep 18 '12 at 0:47

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Let $f$ be the common limit of the uniformly convergent subsequence. Suppose $f_n$ does not converge uniformly to $f$, so we have some $\epsilon>0$ and a collection of points $x_{n_k}\in [a,b]$ such that $n_k\to \infty$ and $\|f_{n_k}(x_{n_k})-f(x_{n_k})\|>\epsilon$. But then no subsequence of $f_{n_k}$ can converge uniformly to $f$, a contradiction. Hence $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$.

share|improve this answer
    
Ohhh, you are too smart! –  Stuart Sep 18 '12 at 6:10

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.