Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $a_n>0$ and $b_n\geq 0$, then $\lim\sup(a_nb_n)\leq \lim\sup(a_n)\limsup(b_n)$

My attempt at a proof is as follows. Let $A_n=\sup\{a_n, a_{n+1},...\}$, $B_n=\sup\{b_n, b_{n+1},...\}$, and $C_n=\sup\{a_nb_n, a_{n+1}b_{n+1},...\}$.

Note: $a_mb_m \leq A_nB_n$ for all $m \geq n$.

Thus $\limsup(a_nb_n)=\lim C_n \leq \lim (A_nB_n) = (\lim A_n)(\lim B_n) = (\limsup a_n)(\limsup b_n).$

share|cite|improve this question
Looks good to me. What is your question? – Alex Becker Sep 17 '12 at 3:50
Is this proof even reasonable? That is, I feel like I'm missing something. – emka Sep 17 '12 at 3:52
If you want to be super picky, to say $\lim(A_nB_n)=(\lim A_n)(\lim B_n)$, you need to first show the two individual limits exist. Of course this was probably done in defining what a limsup is in the first place. – Alex R. Sep 17 '12 at 3:57
What do you mean exactly? – emka Sep 17 '12 at 4:07
the limit of products factors into the product of limits iff both individual limits $\lim A_n$ and $\lim B_n$ exist by themselves. As a contradiction, consider: $1=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} \frac{n}{n}\neq (\lim n)(\lim \frac{1}{n})=undetermined$ – Alex R. Sep 17 '12 at 4:16

1 Answer 1

Missing pieces:

  1. You need to assume the sequences are bounded. Otherwise the statement may be even nonsensical: how to interpret $1\le 0\cdot \infty$, for example?

  2. $(A_n)$ and $(B_n)$ are nonnegative nonincreasing sequences; these properties imply the existence of the limits $\lim A_n$ and $\lim B_n$, which allows to conclude about the existence and the value of $\lim (A_nB_n)$.

You could have assumed $a_n\ge 0$ instead of $a_n>0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.