Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I remember from my linear algebra courses that if I have a $n\times n$ matrix with coefficients in a field (denoted as $A$) and I have a polynomial $P $ over the field s.t. $P(A)=0$ and a decompostion $P=f(x)g(x)$ over the field then $f(A)=0$ or $g(A)=0$.

This was used to calculate the minimal polynomial of $A$.

My question is: Is the statement above that $f(A)=0$ or $g(A)=0$ is correct or maybe I remember wrong ? the reason I am asking is that there are non zero matrices $B,C$ s.t. $BC=0$ so I don't see how the conclusion was made

share|improve this question
1  
I think it's wrong, consider matrix $2\times 2$, such that the left top entry equal $1$ and zero otherwise, we have $A^2-A=0$, and $P(x)=x(x-1)$, so $f(x)=x$ and $g(x)=x-1$, but clearly neither $f(A)$ or $g(A)$ is zero. –  Ajat Adriansyah Sep 15 '12 at 10:22
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

This isn't correct. For example, the matrix $A = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}$ satisfies $p(A)=0$ where $p(t)=t^2$, however $p(t)=f(t)g(t)$ where $f(t)=g(t)=t$ and $f(A) \ne 0 \ne g(A)$.

There are some similar-ish results that you might be thinking of. I'll list a few. Let $A$ be a matrix with characteristic polynomial $p$ and minimal polynomial $m$ over a given (well-behaved) field.

  • $A$ satisfies its minimal polynomial; that is, $m(A) = 0$.
  • If $f$ is a polynomial then $f(A)=0$ if and only if $m\, |\, f$; in particular, $p(A)=0$.
  • If $m(t)=f(t)g(t)$ and $f(A)=0$ then $g$ is constant.
share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, I was thinking on the second point –  Belgi Sep 15 '12 at 10:28
add comment

It is not true.

The minimal polynomial doesn't have to be irreducible.For instance if you consider the $2 \times 2$ diagonal matrix with $1$ and $2$ on the main diagonal, then it's minimal polynomial would be $X^2-3X+2$, but $X-1$ and $X-2$ won't vanish the matrix.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.