Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If $A_1$ and $A_2$ are two collection of subsets in $\Omega$ (Sample Space), I need to prove that $$\sigma(A_1) \subseteq \sigma(A_2).$$ I understand that there exist minimal unique $\sigma$-algebras generated by $A_1$ & $A_2$ respectively. However, I am not sure what needs to be demonstrated mathematically, in order to prove the subset status.

I tried to construct an example for this. Let A1={1,2} , A2={1,2,3} , Ω={1,2,3,4}

Then,

σ(A1)={∅,Ω,{1,2},{3,4}}

σ(A2)={∅,Ω,{1,2,3},{4}}

How can I proceed beyond this. I am confused as how to interpret the subsets as opposed to elements.

Appreciate your comments. Thank you.

share|improve this question
1  
Where is the problem from? –  Jonas Meyer Sep 15 '12 at 6:21
    
Your slashes are the wrong one by the way. You should use the backslash. –  aviness Sep 15 '12 at 6:24
6  
Probably add the hypothesis $A_1\subset A_2$. After this is done, remind us how $\sigma(A)$ was introduced to you. –  Did Sep 15 '12 at 6:25
    
If by "with the equality" you mean that $\sigma(A_1)=\sigma(A_2)$ might hold, you might want to use $\subseteq$ (produced by \subseteq) instead of $\subset$ (produced by \subset). Also note that you can get subscripts in $A_1$ and $A_2$ like this: A_1, A_2. –  joriki Sep 15 '12 at 6:26
1  
What did means is that you need some condition in order to say something. –  AD. Sep 15 '12 at 8:38

2 Answers 2

In view of the Edit, I suggest to solve the exercise below.

Exercise Let $A$ and $B$ denote two subsets of a nonempty set $\Omega$. Let $\mathcal F$ denote the smallest sigma-algebra containing $A$ and $\mathcal G$ the smallest sigma-algebra containing $B$.

  • Assume that $\mathcal F\subset \mathcal G$ and $\mathcal F\ne \mathcal G$. Then, either $A=\varnothing$ or $A=\Omega$.
  • Assume that $\mathcal F=\mathcal G$. Then, either $A=B$ or $A=\Omega\setminus B$.
share|improve this answer
    
I am sorry, but it's not clear to me yet. Could you please explain further. –  Pichchamal Sep 15 '12 at 19:59
    
?? Did you try the exercise? –  Did Sep 15 '12 at 20:08

You may forget the hypothesis $A_1\subset A_2$ or another one which is equivalent to it.

Then we know that $A_2$ is in $\sigma(A_2)$, then $A_1$ is in $\sigma(A_2)$. Since $\sigma(A_1)$ is the smallest $\sigma$-algebra which contains $A_1$, then $\sigma(A_1)\subset \sigma(A_2)$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.