Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I keep looking at this picture and its driving me crazy. How can the smaller circle travel the same distance when its circumference is less than the entire wheel?

demonstration image

share|cite|improve this question
The wheel paradox is simply a cute way of showing that one-to-one correspondence does not imply equality of length. A more straightforward way of showing this is by drawing a line from the top vertex of an isosceles triange to its base, passing though a segment connecting the two equal sides of triangle and parallel to the base. – Mike Jones Aug 18 '11 at 10:55
I don't have an answer---- but--- what if the wheel made two or 3 revolutions. If you got rid of the straight line and just put a pencil dot where the line hit the circles, wouldn't the center of the wheel make a straight line and the smaller circle trace a loop and the outside circle trace a loop showing it was trying to go in the opposite direction ?? – user39706 Sep 7 '12 at 14:43
-1 No, the point on the outer rim traces out a cyclod: see or The point on the inner circle traces out a curate cycloid: see – Ross Millikan Sep 7 '12 at 16:49
suppose the horizontal line is a railroad rail and the wheel rests on it. The point on the outer rim traces a cyclod. The point on the inner circle traces a cycloid. However a railroad wheel has a flange that extends about an inch and 1/2 below the outer rim sitting on the rail. Now what does that trace line look like ? – user39706 Sep 8 '12 at 21:21
The trace line of a point on the wheel that contacts the rail traces a cycloid, as that is the radius that moves without slipping. The trace line on the flange that extends below the rail traces a prolate cycloid which has a small loop where the point travels backwards. – Ross Millikan Sep 8 '12 at 21:45
up vote 24 down vote accepted

That picture confuses things by making it look as though the red line is being "unwound" from the circle like paper towel being unwound from a roll. Our brains pick up on that, since it is a real-world example.

Both circles complete a single revolution, and both travel the same distance from left to right. If these really were rolls of paper towel, the smaller roll would have to spin faster (and therefore complete more than one full revolution) in order to lay out the same length of paper towel as the larger roll. Alternatively, if the two rolls were spinning at the same rate, the free end of the strip of towel left behind by the smaller roll would also move to the right.

In short, the image is a kind of optical/mental illusion, and you're not going crazy :)

share|cite|improve this answer

the smaller wheel does not just rotate, but also slides. If you had cogwheels instead of smooth wheels, you'd notice that movement is not possible.

share|cite|improve this answer
Excellent answer, which I have up-voted. – Mike Jones Aug 18 '11 at 10:44
@OP: I recommend that you accept this answer. – Mike Jones Aug 18 '11 at 10:56

As e.James mentions, the amount of red line laid out by the inner wheel is twice the circumference of the inner wheel. So the impression that the inner wheel is rolling out the red line is an illusion. In actuality, the inner wheel slips as it rolls out the red line. The slippage is hard to see since the only fixed reference that appears on the inner wheel is its radius that follows its rotation, and its radius only comes near the line on which the wheel is rolling at the ends of the line.

I have isolated the inner wheel and placed a second wheel just below it which actually rolls out a red and green line in a proper length-for-length manner. Watching the two together, makes the slippage more noticeable.

${\hspace{4cm}}$enter image description here

share|cite|improve this answer
Which software did you use to produce this figure? – yaa09d Oct 20 '15 at 10:35
@yaa09d: I used Mathematica to generate the animation. – robjohn Oct 20 '15 at 12:06

If the two circles are fixed, then they will be traveling the same difference, but at different velocities.

In fact, the ratio of the radii is equal to the ratio of the velocities a point on either circle will be traveling.

If you tried to repeat this by putting two different-sized circles on a track and making them spin to come out to be the same distance with the same angular velocity, you will notice that one of the circles will have to slide/slip along the track in order to keep them at the same pace.

share|cite|improve this answer

Have two cylindrical wheels spin on an axle which passes through their centers. Draw a line vertical to the axle. At the point of the intersection of the line with the two wheels tie on each point a ball of string. After one revolution the lengths of string on each cylindrical wheel are different and proportional to the radius of the wheels.

share|cite|improve this answer

Look at the path traced by each contact point between a circle and its red line. The larger wheel's point traces a much longer path from its starting point to its finishing point. The distance from start to finish is the same for each circle, but the path to reach it is different.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.