Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $(X, \rho)$ be a Polish space. Consider an Iterated Function System $(S_i,p_i)_{i=1,...,N}$, where $S_i:X\rightarrow X$, $p_i: X\rightarrow \left[0,1\right]$ are continuous functions and $\sum_{i=1}^N p_i(x)=1$, for all $x\in X$. We assume that there exists $0<r<1$ such that $$(*) \quad \sum_{i=1}^N p_i(x) \rho(S_i(x), S_i(y))\leq r \rho(x,y)\;\;\; (x,y \in X)$$ and $\inf_x p_i(x)>0$, $i=1,...,N$. Clearly, the transition operator of our IFS is given by: $$\mu P=\sum_{i=1}^N \int_{X} 1_A(S_i(x))p_i(x)\,\mu(dx)\;\;\; (\mu\in\mathcal{M}_{prob}(X), \; A\in\mathcal{B}(X))$$

My question is the following:

Assume that $\delta_xP^n\stackrel{w}{\rightarrow}\pi_x$ and $\delta_yP^n\stackrel{w}{\rightarrow}\pi_y$ (as usual $P^n$ is determined by the Chapman-Kolmogorov equation), where $\pi_x$ and $\pi_y$ are invariant distributions of $P$. Is true that $\mbox{supp } \pi_x \cap \mbox{supp }\pi_y\neq \emptyset$?

It seems to be true because one can show that $\mbox{supp }\delta_x P^n=\{(S_{i_n}\circ ...S_{i_1})(x): i_1,..,i_n\in\{1...,N\}\}$ and from (*) it follows that for any $x,y \in X$ we can choose $i_1,...,i_m$ such that $$\rho((S_{i_m}\circ ...S_{i_1})(x),(S_{i_m}\circ ...S_{i_1})(y))\leq r^m\rho(x,y).$$

However, I was able to show only that $\mbox{dist } (\mbox{supp } \pi_x, \mbox{supp }\pi_y)=0$

share|improve this question
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.