Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm trying to read the paper "Particle flow for nonlinear filters with log-homotopy" by Daum and Huang. ( )

As far as I understand, they reduce their problem to solving the differential equation

$$ \frac{\partial\log(f_\lambda)}{\partial x} \frac{dx}{d\lambda} + \frac{\partial\log(f_\lambda)}{\partial \lambda} = 0$$

However, they then write: For $d=1$, we can solve the equation exactly by writing

$$ \frac{dx}{d\lambda} = -\frac{\partial\log(f_\lambda)}{\partial \lambda} / \frac{\partial\log(f_\lambda)}{\partial x} $$

for non-zero gradient and $\frac{dx}{d\lambda} = 0$ otherweise, but for $d>1$, we cannot simply solve the equation by division as above.

I have so far only seen $d$ as the symbol for total derivative, so I have no idea what their explanation is supposed to mean?

share|cite|improve this question
$d$ wouldn't stand for the dimension, would it? – Gerry Myerson Sep 13 '12 at 6:38
Ouch! Of course, you're right. Thank you! – Benno Sep 13 '12 at 12:43

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.