Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

$$\left(\frac{dU}{dT}\right)_p= \left( \frac{\partial U}{\partial T} \right)_v + \left( \frac{\partial U}{\partial V}\right)_T \left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial T}\right)_p$$

Using maxwell relations etc, can you show me how to prove above thermodynamic relation.

share|cite|improve this question

When dealing with thermodynamic equalities, it is very useful to introduce Jacobian determinants $$ \frac{\partial (u,v)}{\partial (x,y)} = \begin{vmatrix} (\partial_x u)_y & (\partial_y u)_x \\ (\partial_x v)_y & (\partial_y v)_x \end{vmatrix}.$$ Here, we have and will implicitly assume that $u(x,y)$ and $v(x,y)$. But because we often change the variables which the function depends on, we always keep the variable which is kept constant as a subscript to the bracket surrounding the partial derivative. In thermodynamics, you should always think that functions are defined implicitly. All quantities live on a 2D surface. Thus specifying two independent coordinates you can figure out a third one.

The Jacobian have the following relevant properties: $$\frac{\partial (u,y)}{\partial (x,y)} = \left( \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} \right)_y,$$ $$\frac{\partial (u,v)}{\partial (x,y)} = \left(\frac{\partial (x,y)}{\partial (u,v)} \right)^{-1}, \qquad\text{(inverse function theorem)}$$ and $$\frac{\partial (u,v)}{\partial (x,y)} = \frac{\partial (u,v)}{\partial (s,t)} \frac{\partial (s,t)}{\partial (x,y)} . \qquad\text{(chain rule)}$$

In your case $$\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T} \right)_p= \frac{\partial (U,p)}{\partial (T,p)} = \frac{\partial(U,p)/\partial(T,V) }{\partial(T,p)/\partial(T,V)} = \frac{(\partial U/\partial T)_V (\partial p/\partial V)_T - (\partial U/\partial V)_T (\partial p/\partial T)_V}{\left(\partial p/\partial V\right)_T}. $$ Now, we evaluate $$\frac{(\partial p/\partial T)_V}{(\partial p/\partial V)_T} = \frac{\partial(p,V)}{\partial(T,V)} \Big/\frac{\partial(p,T)}{\partial(V,T)} = - \frac{\partial(p,V)}{\partial(V,T)} \frac{\partial(V,T)}{\partial(p,T)} = - \frac{\partial(p,V)}{\partial(p,T)} = -\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial T}\right)_p .$$ So in total, we have $$\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T} \right)_p =\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_V +\left( \frac{\partial U}{\partial V}\right)_T \left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial T}\right)_p. $$

Note that we did not use any Maxwell relation. Your relation is just a fact about partial derivatives.

share|cite|improve this answer

The quantity $U$ can be considered as a function of $p$ and $T$, let's write it as $U = f(p,T)$, or as a function of $V$ and $T$, let's write that as $U=g(V,T)$. We can also view $V$ as a function of $p$ and $T$, which we write as $V=h(p,T)$, and this gives us the relation between the two ways of representing $U$: $$ f(P,T)=g(h(p,T),T). $$ Taking the partial derivative w.r.t. $T$ on both sides, gives (according to the chain rule) $$ \frac{\partial f}{\partial T}(P,T) = \frac{\partial g}{\partial V}(h(p,T),T) \cdot \frac{\partial h}{\partial T}(p,T) + \frac{\partial g}{\partial T}(h(p,T),T) \cdot 1 , $$ and this is just another way of writing your relation. (In a pure mathematician's notation, one might say, since (unlike phycisists and applied mathematicians) we avoid using the same letter for a physical quantity and for the mathematical function which represents the dependence of that quantity on other physical quantities. In this case, I would say that this practice reduces the risk of confusion, at least for beginners.)

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.