Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Hi I have some questions regarding integrals on manifolds.

1) Let $M_n$ be differentiable orientable manifold. The integral of a differential $n$-form $w$ with compact support is:

Let $(\Omega_i, \varphi_i)$ be an atlas compatible with the orientation chosen, and $\{\alpha_i\}$ be a partition of unity subordinate to $\{\Omega_i\}$. On $\Omega_i$, $w = f_i(x)dx_i^1 \wedge ... \wedge dx_i^n$. The integral is $$\int_M w = \sum_i \int_{\varphi_i(\Omega_i)}[\alpha_i(x)f_i(x)]\circ \varphi_i^{-1}dx^1 \wedge ... \wedge dx^n $$

This definition confuses me. Why do we need the partition of unity and the inverse of the chart map? Since $x^j$ presumeably denotes the coordinates, can't we just do a normal integral $\int f dx^1 ... dx^n$?

2) For a manifold $M$, let $i:\partial M \to M$ be the inclusion map. In Stokes' formula, it is customary to write $\int_{\partial M} w$ to mean $\int_{\partial M} i^*w$.

Can someone explain to me the meaning of this second integral? We are integrating over the boundary of the manifold the integrand which is the pullback of a differential form on $M$. I can't see the intuition at all.

share|improve this question
3  
1. What if your form is not contained in any single chart? 2. The pullback of a form along an inclusion is basically just the restriction to the submanifold. –  Zhen Lin Sep 11 '12 at 12:38
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Zhen Lin answered your question (2) in his comment and most of question (1).

To answer the last part of (1) quickly:

Your confusion is coming because you aren't keeping track of where the various functions are defined. Each $\Omega_i \subset M$. The functions $\alpha_i(x) f(x)$ are defined on $\Omega_i$. The term in the integral: \[ \int_{\phi_i(\Omega_i)} [ \alpha_i(x) f_i(x) ] \circ \phi_i^{-1} dx^1 \wedge \dots dx^n \] is integrating in $\mathbb{R}^n$ (over the open set $\phi_i(\Omega_i)$). The composition with $\phi_i^{-1}$ is just "moving" the function $\alpha_i(x) f(x)$ to $\phi_i(\Omega_i)$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.