Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

We know that for two real numbers $a,b$ and two random variables $X,Y$ we have that $E(a X + b Y ) = a E(X) + b E(Y)$. Under what conditions is it also true that for any three random variables $X,Y,Z$, we have that $E\bigl(X (Y + Z)\bigr) = E(X Y + X Z) = E(X Y) + E(X Z)$?

In this equation you are allowed to assume that there exist joint distributions for $X,Y$ and $X,Z$ but not necessarily for $X,Y,Z$. So, as per Michael's answer below, the question would seem to reduce to when a joint distribution exists given distributions for $X,Y$ and $X,Z$.

share|cite|improve this question
That's distributivity, not associativity. – mjqxxxx Sep 10 '12 at 17:20
For real numbers, you have $X(Y+Z) = XY + XZ$. Hence you have $E(X(Y+Z)) = E(XY + XZ)$. Expectation is linear, so you have $ E(XY + XZ) = E XY + E XZ$. – copper.hat Sep 10 '12 at 17:20
Thanks mjqxxxx, editted. I think it can't always be true because the violation of this property is needed to arrive at the violation of Bell inequalities in quantum mechanics. – SMeznaric Sep 10 '12 at 17:23
Your equation $E(aU+bV)=aE(U)+bE(V)$ answers the question. – André Nicolas Sep 10 '12 at 17:23
Thanks to everyone who tried to answer my question. I have now found a partial answer to my question. Unfortunately there is no guarantee that given marginal or conditional distributions for $X,Y$ and $X,Z$, there exists a joint distribution for $X,Y,Z$. This is why the distributive law does not always hold. The paper dealing with conditional distributions can be seen here. However, if anyone can lucidate the matter with a simple condition, the question is still open. I have also editted the question to make it clearer what I want. – SMeznaric Sep 11 '12 at 11:05

In the form in which you've written it, $E\bigl(X (Y + Z)\bigr) = E(X Y + X Z) = E(X Y) + E(X Z)$, it's always true ("always" means whenever the expected values involved exist) since $XY$ and $XZ$ is a random variable and $XY+XZ$ is their sum. The expected value of the sum is the sum of the two expected values. You've applied the distributive law above only to show that $X (Y + Z)=(X Y) + (X Z)$, and that does not in any way depend on any facts about expected values. If you wanted to separate that last term into $E(X)E(Z)$ or something like that, that would be another matter. That will work if $X$ and $Z$ are uncorrelated (independence is a stronger hypothesis than what is needed here).

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for your answer Michael. Here is what I don't understand. Suppose $X,Y$ follow some measure $dp(x,y)$ (where $x,y$ are particular values of $X,Y$) and $X,Z$ follow $dq(x,y)$, where you can assume that $p$ and $q$ are densities. Now of course $\int dy p(x,y) = \int dz q(x,z)$. It is not obvious to me that $E(XY) + E(XZ) = int dx dy p(x,y) x y + \int dx dz q(x,z) x z = \int dx dy dz x(y+z) r(x,y,z) = E\bigl(X(Y+Z)\bigr)$. Does such extension of $p$ and $q$ always exist? – SMeznaric Sep 10 '12 at 18:38

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.