Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I want to find a counter example

This is the Fubini theorem for sequences:

If $$\sum^{\infty}_{n=1}\sum^{\infty}_{m=1}|a_{mn}|<\infty,$$



Then, does there exist a sequence $\{a_{mn}\}$ such that the left and the right hand sides of equality are finite but are not equal?

share|cite|improve this question

Fubini's theorem (in the special case of sequences) says that if $\sum\sum|a_{mn}|<\infty$ then interchanging the order of summation in $\sum_m \sum_n a_{mn}$ is acceptable. Note the lack of modulus signs here. In contrast, interchanging the order of summation is always acceptable in $\sum\sum |a_{mn}|$, since the summands are nonnegative (this is sometimes called Tonelli's theorem). In this case, equality means that if either side is finite then they both are and they're equal.

If $\sum\sum|a_{mn}|=\infty$, then it may happen that $\sum_m \sum_n a_{mn}$ and $\sum_n \sum_m a_{mn}$ are different, even if they are both finite. Indeed, try summing the rows and columns of the following infinite matrix:

$$\left(\begin{array}{cccccc} 1 & - 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 &\cdots\\ 0 & 1 & -1 & 0 & 0 &\cdots\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & -1 & 0 &\cdots\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & -1 &\cdots\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 &\cdots\\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots &\vdots &\vdots & \ddots\\ \end{array}\right)$$

share|cite|improve this answer
Yes, but this doesn't satisfy the condition $\sum^{\infty}_{n=1}\sum^{\infty}_{m=1}|a_{mn}|<\infty$, does it? – Old John Sep 10 '12 at 14:37
@JohnSenior: Such an example is going to be hard to find, as Sean now points out (correctly) in the first paragraph. – t.b. Sep 10 '12 at 14:49
Yes, but I was commenting on Sean's answer before he corrected/explained it :) The initial version seemed to indicate that the example satisfied all the conditions required by the OP. – Old John Sep 10 '12 at 14:51
I added the absolute values in the second formula of the question, given that the OP missed it at all (he simply write $\sum_m\sum_n=\sum_n\sum_m$). – enzotib Sep 10 '12 at 14:55
@enzotib And you should not have. – Did Sep 10 '12 at 15:32

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.