Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If $f \colon [a,b] \rightarrow [c,d]$ is a bijection, $f\in \mathcal{R}$ and $f^{-1}$ exists, then prove or disprove that $f^{-1} \in \mathcal{R} [c,d]$.

Remark: I tried to use integration by parts to find $\int_{c}^{d} f^{-1}$ and to prove that was the right limit of Riemann sum, but failed. But I think this idea might be useful.

share|cite|improve this question
@user5980: I take it you don't know the characterization of Riemann integrable functions in terms of Lebesgue measure? – Arturo Magidin Jan 28 '11 at 5:30
Sorry, I just know some basics about Lebesgue measure. I suppose $f^{-1}$ is Lebesgue integrable. – Junyu Jan 28 '11 at 6:28
Isn't assuming $f$ is a bijection and also that $f^{-1}$ exists redundant? – Benji Jan 28 '11 at 18:11
@user5980:The Riemann integrable functions on [a,b] are precisely the functions which are continuous a.e. (under the Lebesgue measure) on on [a,b]. So essentially the question is: If $f:[a,b]\rightarrow[c,d]$ is continuous a.e. and $f^{-1}$ exists, then is $f^{-1}:[c,d]\rightarrow [a,b]$ continuous a.e.? – Benji Jan 28 '11 at 18:20
@bobobinks: Right; though if the OP only knows the basics, then presumably (s)he is not expected to solve this problem via that route. – Arturo Magidin Jan 28 '11 at 20:15

1 Answer 1

up vote 13 down vote accepted

Let $C\subset[0,1]$ be the middle thirds Cantor set, and let $D\subset[0,1]$ be a fat Cantor set. Define $f:[0,1]\to[0,1]$ such that $f\vert_C$ is an order preserving homeomorphism of $C$ onto $D$ (by mapping to corresponding endpoints of the removed intervals), and $f\vert_{[0,1]\setminus C}$ is an order reversing homeomorphism of $[0,1]\setminus C$ onto $[0,1]\setminus D$ (by mapping linearly to corresponding removed intervals and then composing with $x\mapsto 1-x$). Then $f$ is discontinuous at each point of $C$ and continuous at each point of $[0,1]\setminus C$. Since $C$ has measure zero, $f$ is Riemann integrable. On the other hand, $f^{-1}$ is discontinuous at each point of $D$, so it is not Riemann integrable.

If you don't want to appeal to the Lebesgue criterion of Riemann integrability, you could work explicitly with Riemann sums of $f$ and $f^{-1}$. In the case of $f$, you can choose partitions such that the contribution of intervals containing points of $C$ is arbitrarily small. In the case of $f^{-1}$, the values of $f^{-1}$ on $D\cap[\frac{1}{2},1]$ are at least $\frac{2}{3}$ and the values of $f^{-1}$ on $[\frac{1}{2},1]\setminus D$ are at most $\frac{1}{2}$. Every interval contains points from $[0,1]\setminus D$, so the difference between upper and lower sums will always be at least $(\frac{2}{3}-\frac{1}{2})(\frac{1}{2}m(D))\gt 0$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Nice, Jonas. – Jonas Teuwen Jan 28 '11 at 23:17
@Jonas, does this contradict the fact that C is uncountable, and any function in $\mathbb{R}$ can't have uncountably many jump discontinuities? – MadcowD Oct 29 at 5:09
@MadcowD: There are no jump discontinuities here. – Jonas Meyer Oct 29 at 11:15
@JonasMeyer is there any reason why? – MadcowD Oct 29 at 15:38
@MadcowD: Consider the same question for the characteristic function of the Cantor set. The reason is that nowhere does it satisfy the definition of jump discontinuity. It helps to note the C has no isolated points, and its complement is dense. – Jonas Meyer Oct 30 at 12:47

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.