Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $$ f(x) :=\exp{[{\sin{(x^{10}+x^{11})}}]}, \qquad x \in \mathbb R. $$ Calculate $$ \frac{d^{32}}{dx^{32}}f(x)\mid_{x=0} . $$

I'm really puzzled. What should I do? Should I use some power series? But the question is: how can I use them?

Well, since $\exp(\cdot)$ and $\sin(\cdot)$ are analytic, I can write $$ f(x)= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \left[(-1)^k\frac{(x^{10}+x^{11})^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!}\right]^n\frac{1}{n!} $$

But now what do I have to do?

Thanks in advance.

share|cite|improve this question
yes, you should just use the power series for exp and sin. Notice that $10+11+11$ is the only way of getting $32$. – user8268 Sep 7 '12 at 8:23
Thanks a lot for your comment. Unfortunately I still don't manage to solve the problem: see my edits, if you want. Thanks a lot. – Romeo Sep 7 '12 at 8:32
If you try to differentiate term by term, you'll see that really many coefficients are zero. – Siminore Sep 7 '12 at 8:33
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Using the power series expansion is not so complicated if you notice that differentiating 32 times will eliminate any power of $x$ below 32, and setting $x=0$ will eliminate any term which has a power of $x$ greater than 32. There are high powers of $x$ involved so we do not need to look at many terms, and we can cut off the expansion once we get to $x^{32}$. It seems to me that just writing it out explicitly, leaving out irrelevant terms as you go, is as easy as any other method.

Do two stages using $R$ for an irrelevant remainder:

$$\sin(x^{10}+x^{11}) = x^{10}+x^{11}-\frac {(x^{10}+x^{11})^3}{3!}+R = x^{10}+x^{11}-\frac {x^{30}} 6-\frac{x^{31}} 2-\frac{x^{32}} 2+R$$

Now note that when this is exponentiated, the terms in $x^{30}$ and higher will become irrelevant when the whole expression is squared or cubed, so (ignoring irrelevant terms):

$$e^{x^{10}+x^{11}-\frac {x^{30}} 6-\frac{x^{31}} 2-\frac{x^{32}} 2} = 1+\left(x^{10}+x^{11}-\frac {x^{30}} 6-\frac{x^{31}} 2-\frac{x^{32}} 2\right)+\frac 1 2 (x^{10}+x^{11})^2+\frac 1 6(x^{10}+x^{11})^3+R$$

The only ultimately relevant term, as noted above, is the one in $x^{32}$, and picking this out from the terms we have we see that: $$f(x)=-\frac{x^{32}}2+\frac{x^{32}}2+R$$

The coefficient we are looking for vanishes, and the answer to the question is therefore 0.

share|cite|improve this answer
@sasha - I have said that the answer is zero. All the lower order terms are irrelevant by my first comment (they are "differentiated away") and are included in $R$. The coefficient of $x^{32}$ vanishes. I didn't need to bother with the others. – Mark Bennet Sep 7 '12 at 14:48

HINT: Suppose that you’ve written out the power series as $f(x)=\sum_{n\ge 0}a_nx^n$. When you take the $32$-nd derivative, the terms in $x^n$ with $n<32$ will disappear. Then when you evaluate $f^{(32)}(x)$ at $x=0$, all of the terms except the constant term will disappear. Thus, you need only find $a_{32}$. To do this, you need to examine the summation

$$f(x)= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \left[\frac{(x^{10}+x^{11})^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!}\right]^n\frac{1}{n!}$$

closely to see which combinations of $k$ and $n$ give you $x^{32}$ terms.

(Actually, first you need to correct it: the Taylor series for the sine alternates, and you’re missing a factor of $(-1)^k$. And make sure that you realize that the $\frac1{n!}$ is not inside the inner summation.)

share|cite|improve this answer
Watch out the signs in the expansion of the sine. – Did Sep 7 '12 at 8:58
...and the placement of the brackets. – Sean Eberhard Sep 7 '12 at 9:04
@did: Thanks: that hit me just as you posted. – Brian M. Scott Sep 7 '12 at 9:08

The function $f$ is analytic hence $f(x)=\sum\limits_{n\geqslant0}a_nx^n$ for some coefficients $(a_n)_{n\geqslant0}$ and $f^{(n)}(0)=n!a_n$ for every $n\geqslant0$. Furthermore, for every $n\geqslant0$, $f(x)=\sum\limits_{k=0}^na_kx^k+o(x^{n+1})$. Hence the task is to compute the coefficient $a_{32}$ of $x^{32}$ in the expansion of $f(x)$ at $x=0$.

To do so, note that $$\sin(u)=u-\frac16u^3+O(u^5)$$ when $u\to0$ and consider $u=x^{10}+x^{11}=x^{10}(1+x)$. Then $$\sin(u)=x^{10}(1+x)-\frac16x^{30}(1+x)^3+O(x^{50}),$$ that is, $\sin(u)=x^{10}v+o(x^{32})$ with $v=1+x-\frac16x^{20}-\frac12x^{21}-\frac12x^{22}$.

Likewise, $$\mathrm e^w=1+w+\frac12w^2+\frac16w^3+O(w^4)$$ when $w\to0$ hence $$f(x)=1+x^{10}v+\frac12x^{20}v^2+\frac16x^{30}v^3+O(x^{40}).$$ The $x^{32}$ terms in the RHS are $x^{10}(-\frac12x^{22})$ in $x^{10}v$, $0$ in $x^{20}v^2$ since $v^2$ has no $x^{12}$ term, and $3x^{32}$ in $x^{30}v^3$ since $v^3=1+3x+3x^2+o(x^2)$.

Finally, $a_{32}=-\frac12+\frac163=0$ hence $f^{(32)}(0)=0$.

share|cite|improve this answer
This seems in contrato to WA's answer:[Exp[Sin[x^%2810%29%2Bx^%2811%29]]%2C‌​{x%2C0%2C35}] – Siminore Sep 7 '12 at 8:40
@Siminore Does it? – Did Sep 7 '12 at 8:55
I had seen a different conclusion, but maybe I was wrong. – Siminore Sep 7 '12 at 8:56
@Siminore Looks like you were... – Did Sep 7 '12 at 10:30
@Siminor The correct answer is zero. Here is a series expansion: $$\exp(\sin(x^{10}+x^{11})) = 1+x^{10}+x^{11} + \frac{1}{2}x^{20} + x^{21} + \frac{1}{2}x^{22} - \frac{1}{8} x^{40} + \mathcal{O}\left(x^{41}\right)$$ – Sasha Sep 7 '12 at 14:22

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.