Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In this context composition series means the same thing as defined here.

As the title says given a finite group $G$ and $H \unlhd G$ I would like to show there is a composition series containing $H.$

Following is my attempt at it.

The main argument of the claim is showing the following.

Lemma. If $H \unlhd G$ and $G/H$ is not simple then there exist a subgroup $I$ such that $H \unlhd I \unlhd G.$

The proof follows from the 4th isomorphism theorem since if $G/H$ is not simple then there is a normal subgroup $\overline{I} \unlhd G/H$ of the form $\overline{I} = H/I.$

Suppose now that $G/H$ is not simple. Using the above lemma we deduce that there exist a finite chain of groups (since $G$ is finite) such that $$H \unlhd I_1 \unlhd \cdots \unlhd I_k \unlhd G$$ and $G/I_k$ is simple. Now one has to repeat this process for all other pairs $I_{i+1}/I_{i}$ and for $I_1/H$ until the quotients are simple groups. This is all fine since all the subgroups are finite as well.

Now if $H$ is simple we are done otherwise there is a group $J \unlhd H$ and we inductively construct the composition for $H.$

Is the above "proof" correct? If so, is there a way to make it less messy?

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Your approach has all the elements of a proof, but I wanted to offer suggestions for a "less messy" version.

First of all, as long as you are using that "any finite group has a composition series", you shouldn't need your lemma.

You could go about it this way. Let $H$ be a normal subgroup of $G$. Then $H$ has a composition series $1=H_0<\dots<H_k=H$. The group $G/H$ also has a composition series, which we will enumerate this way:

$$ H/H=H_{k}/H<\dots <H_n/H=G/H $$

By an isomorphism theorem, the fact that $(H_{k}/H)/(H_{k-1}/H)$ is simple is equivalent to $H_k/H_{k-1}$ being simple.

Putting these two chains together, you have that $H_0<\dots <H_n$ is a composition series for $G$ through $H$.

share|improve this answer

Yes your proof is essentially correct. You can make it look less messy as follows. Noticing that the proof that $G$ has a composition series in the first place has the same structure as your proof, you could do a two-in-one-blow induction on the order of $G$ by showing: "$G$ has a composition series, and if $H$ is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup of $G$, then it can be chosen to pass through $H$".

The base cases are $G$ trivial or simple, and the statement is obvious then (the second part is vacuously satisfied). Otherwise there exists a nontrivial proper normal subgroup $H$ of $G$; choose it, or for the second part take the one that is imposed. Now by induction $H$ has a composition series, which we stick below $H$ as part of our final composition series. The quotient $G/H$ also has a composition series, which we "lift" by taking the preimage in $G$ (under the projection modulo $H$) of every subgroup in the series to obtain the part of our composition series between $G$ and $H$, by the isomorphism theorem.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.