Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Exercise 4.5.9 of Jeff Rosenthal's "A first look at rigorous probability" asks whether or not we can prove the linearity of variance for independent random variables by induction; in the text it is proved by noting that in general

\begin{equation} Var(\sum_{i=1}^n X_i) = \sum_{i=1}^n Var(X_i) + 2 \sum_{i < j} Cov(X_i, X_j). \end{equation}

With independent random variables the covariance terms vanish and we get the desired formula.

In particular he asks the following. If we know that $Var(X + Y) = Var(X) + Var(Y)$ when $X$ and $Y$ are independent, then can we conclude that $Var(X + Y + Z) = Var(X) + Var(Y) + Var(Z)$ when $X, Y$, and $Z$ are independent.

I think the answer is yes. We proved earlier in the text that under these assumptions $X + Y$ and $Z$ are independent. Thus

\begin{equation} Var(X + Y + Z) = Var((X + Y) + Z) = Var(X + Y) + Var(Z) = Var(X) + Var(Y) + Var(Z). \end{equation}

Is this correct?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

This is correct, provided you have a convincing proof that if $(X_1,X_2,\ldots,X_{n})$ is independent, for any $n\geqslant3$,, then $(X_1+X_2+\cdots+X_{n-1},X_{n})$ is independent. The fact that if $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ is independent, then $(X_1+X_2,X_3)$ is independent, is not sufficient to perform the induction.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.