Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am trying to prove that

$$ \operatorname{fib}(n)<\left(\frac{5}{3}\right)^n $$

where $\operatorname{fib}(n)$ is the $n^{th}$ fibonacci number. For a proof I used induction, as we know

$$\operatorname{fib}(1)=1,\, \operatorname{fib}(2)=1,\, \operatorname{fib}(3)=2$$

and so on. So for $n=1$; $\operatorname{fib}(1)<\frac{5}{3}$, and for general $n>1$ we will have

$$\operatorname{fib}(n+1)<\left(\frac{5}{3}\right)^{n+1}$$ First of all, $$\left(\frac{5}{3}\right)^{n+1} = \left(\frac{5}{3}\right)^{n} \cdot \left(\frac{5}{3}\right)$$

We have $\operatorname{fib}(n)<\left(\frac{5}{3}\right)^n$ and $\operatorname{fib}(n+1)=\operatorname{fib}(n)+\operatorname{fib}(n-1)$, so by induction we would have $\operatorname{fib}(n-1)<\left(\frac{5}{3}\right)^{n-1}$, and because $\frac{5}{3}>1$, we have $\left(\frac{5}{3}\right)^{n}>1$, so we get the correct result. Are there any flaws in my proof?

share|improve this question
3  
Did you show that $5/3 + 1 = 8/3 < (5/3)^2$? –  Tunococ Sep 5 '12 at 6:50
    
no thanks for this –  dato datuashvili Sep 5 '12 at 6:50
    
generally i have not considered this,because $fib(1)!=5/3$ ;by the way,thank you very much –  dato datuashvili Sep 5 '12 at 6:55

1 Answer 1

up vote 7 down vote accepted

I don't quite understand how you claim you have proved $fib(n + 1) < (5/3)^{n+1}$. You have not even used $fib(n+1) = fib(n) + fib(n-1)$. I only see that $(5/3)^{n+1} > 1$ from your proof.

This is what the induction step is supposed to look like:

$$fib(n + 1) = fib(n) + fib(n - 1) < \left(\frac 53\right)^{n} + \left(\frac 53\right)^{n-1} = \left(\frac 53\right)^{n-1}\left(\frac 83\right) < \left(\frac 53\right)^{n+1}.$$

share|improve this answer
    
please see my proof,i have used that one –  dato datuashvili Sep 5 '12 at 7:02
    
what i have missed is $+(5/3)^{n-1}$ instead of this i used multiplication –  dato datuashvili Sep 5 '12 at 7:06
1  
@dato: What you missed is absolutely crucial and is why what you wrote isn’t a proof. –  Brian M. Scott Sep 5 '12 at 7:08
    
yes yes right,sorry,i was hurry to finish this proof that did not consider it –  dato datuashvili Sep 5 '12 at 7:10

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.