Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

An intersection of principal left ideals need not be principal but incidentally this phenomenon is witnessed in von Neumann regular rings. How about arbitrary intersections of infinitely many principal left ideals in vN-regular rings? Must they be principal? Are there any natural classes of (unital) rings which have such a property?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 0 down vote accepted

I know that the central idempotents of a (right or left) self injective VNR ring is complete, so at the very least any commutative, self-injective VNR ring works for you.

I still feel like it is probably false in general. I don't know enough about von Neumann's "continuous geometry", but I feel like the completeness of those lattices have something to do with the completeness of the lattice of principal left ideals of a VNR ring.

Edit OK, I think this paper by Birkenmeier, Kim and Park is what you're looking for. In case you can't access that, the title is Quasi-Baer ring extensions and biregular rings.

The intro mentions that there are regular rings whose lattices of one sided ideals are not complete.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.