Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've got $8n^2 \lt 64n\log(n)$ and I need to find the $n$ range if $n\gt 0$ to satisfy the inequality.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

So this is n<8*ln(n). If you plot it you can find a range of n that works quite easily. You probably won't be able to solve it exactly, but approximate numerical solutions are available. I find a range of about 1.2 to 26.

share|cite|improve this answer
Wolfram Alpha gives a range of approximately 1.15537 to 26.0935. – Joshua Shane Liberman Jan 26 '11 at 17:42
There's no other way to solve an inequality but to plot the graph? – Denys S. Jan 26 '11 at 17:44
Oops, I got a base 10 log, not natural log. I'll edit to correct – Ross Millikan Jan 26 '11 at 17:45
@den-javamaniac: Without the Lambert W function, there is no algebraic answer. So all you can do is approximate it numerically. You can do that with a graph or with root finding. – Ross Millikan Jan 26 '11 at 17:47

$n$ suggests that it might be a natural number.

Therefore you could use

$8 n^2 < 64 n log(n)$

$\Longleftrightarrow 0 < 8 log(n) - n$

You can easily see that $n$ grows much faster than $log(n)$. Therefore you can see that for $n > 26$ there are no integer solutions. Also the case $n=1$ is problematic as $log(1)=0$. So all in all the numbers $n = \{2,3,\ldots,26\}$ are a solution for your problem. If you need real numbers you will have to use, like already mentioned the Lambert W function ( )

share|cite|improve this answer
+1 for Lambert W function) – Denys S. Jan 27 '11 at 14:21

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.