Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can any one give an "simple" explaination about what is the use of moments in statistics.Why we need moments? what we can learn from it? if possible please use less equations.

Advance thanks for your help

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 15 down vote accepted

The central question in statistics is that given a set of data, we would like to recover the random process that produced the data (that is, the probability law of the population). This question is extremely difficult in general and in the absence of strong assumptions on the underlying random process you really can't get very far (those who work in nonparametric statistics may disagree with me on this). A natural way to approach this problem would be to look for simple objects that do identify the population distribution if we do make some reasonable assumptions.

The question then becomes what type of objects should we search for. The best arguments I know about why we should look at the Laplace (or Fourier; I'll show you what this is in a second if you don't know) transform of the probability measure are a bit complicated, but naively we can draw a good heuristic from elementary calculus: given all the derivatives of an analytic function evaluated at zero we know everything there is to know about the function through its Taylor series.

Suppose for a moment that the function $f(t) = E[e^{tX}]$ exists and is well behaved in a neighborhood of zero. It is a theorem that this function (when it exists and behaves nicely) uniquely identifies the probability law of the random variable $X$. If we do a Taylor expansion of what is inside the expectation, this becomes a power series in the moments of $X$: $f(t) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!} t^k E[X^k]$ and so to completely identify the law of $X$ we just need to know the population moments. In effect we reduce the question above "identify the population law of $X$" to the question "identify the population moments of $X$".

It turns out that (from other statistics) population moments are extremely well estimated by sample moments when they exist, and you can even get a good feel on how far off from the true moments it is possible to be under some often realistic assumptions. Of course we can never get infinitely many moments with any degree of accuracy from a sample, so now we would really want to do another round of approximations, but that is the general idea. For nice random variables, moments are sufficient to estimate the sample law.

I should mention that what I have said above is all heuristic and doesn't work in most interesting modern examples. In truth, I think the right answer to your question is that we don't need moments because for many relevant applications (particularly in economics) it seems unlikely that all moments even exist. The thing is that when you get rid of moment assumptions you lose an enormous amount of information and power: without at least two, the Central Limit Theorem fails and with it go most of the elementary statistical tests. If you do not want to work with moments, there is a whole theory of nonparametric statistics that make no assumptions at all on the random process.

share|cite|improve this answer
+1 for the interesting, concise answer! – Shaktal Sep 3 '12 at 18:47
what do you mean by "the law"? – Yokhen Nov 20 '15 at 2:26
Moments are overrated: You said that the (infinite) collection of all the moments is enough to identify the distribution, that is incorrect, the lognormal distribution is counterexample. It works on finite intervals, though. Neither is it correct that population moments are well estimated by sample moments, above the first few, the sample variation is to enourmous! – kjetil b halvorsen Jan 22 at 11:47
@kjetilbhalvorsen This post is meant to be heuristic, so I was not terribly careful about assumptions. Nevertheless, under the assumption in paragraph 3 (finiteness of the moment generating function on a neighborhood of the origin), the distribution is determined by its moments. I am happy to defer to your better judgment about the quality of sample moments. – Chris Janjigian Jan 22 at 19:40

Moments are the constants of a population as mean, variance etc are. These constants help in deciding the characteristics of the population and on the basis of these characteristics a population is discussed. Moments help in finding AM, SD and Variance of the population directly and they help in knowing the graphic shapes of the population. we can call moments as the constants used in finding the graphic shape as graphic shape of the population also help a lot in characterizing a population.

share|cite|improve this answer

Moment is a very commonly used word in physics and it measures the turning affect of a force around some point. The moment of a force around any point is the product of the magnitude of the force and the perpendicular distance between the point and the force. In Statistics, moments are used to understand the various characteristics of a frequency distribution. With the help of moments, central tendency, dispersion, skewness and kurtosis of a distribution can be studied.

share|cite|improve this answer

The normal distribution is determined by the first two moments. Other families of distribution can be determined by their moments. One method for estimating parameters is to equate moments (called the method of moments).

share|cite|improve this answer

Moments are used to find the central tendency, dispersion, skewness and kurtosis of a distribution

share|cite|improve this answer
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post - you can always comment on your own posts, and once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post. - From Review – kjetil b halvorsen Jan 22 at 11:50

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.