Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The motivation for this question is that I am trying to Read Basic Algebra 2 (despite a somewhat weak background for the book) and if this is true then it is fairly easy to show that monics in Grp are injective and epics are surjective.

In linear algebra/functional analysis you can project an element onto the subspace orthogonal to a given subspace. I wonder if something like this holds in group theory.

Another Question: Does this hold for modules? Given a $R$-module $M$ and a $R$-submodule $N$ is there a homomorphism $f: M \rightarrow M$ s.t $f(N) = \operatorname{id}$?

edit: also wanted $f(x) \neq \operatorname{id}$ if $x$ is not in $H$.

share|cite|improve this question
What about $f(g) = id$ for every $g \in G$? – student Sep 3 '12 at 0:36
How do you prove epics are surjective? – Makoto Kato Sep 3 '12 at 0:40
Learn a little $\TeX$ and your formulas will look nicer. – lhf Sep 3 '12 at 0:43
$\textbf{Grp}$ is monadic over $\textbf{Set}$, and it can be shown that any category monadic over $\textbf{Set}$ has the same regular epimorphisms. The difficulty, then, is in establishing that every epimorphism in $\textbf{Grp}$ is in fact a regular epimorphism. This seems non-trivial. See here. – Zhen Lin Sep 3 '12 at 4:34
up vote 3 down vote accepted

No, groups and modules can be much more shy than vector spaces. The type of modules that behave as you probably want are called semisimple modules. Most groups are very far from this.

The weaker property described by lhf: that $f:G \to G$ is non-trivial with $H \leq \ker(f)$ as long as $H^G < G$ has an easy description for finite length groups and modules: every top composition factor must also occur as a subgroup. In ring theory, a similar property is called Kasch I believe, and makes some appearance in the ring theoretic versions of functional analysis.

Groups such as $\operatorname{SL}(2,q)$ for odd prime powers $q \geq 5$ have only a single composition series with the only non-identity proper term being the center. The quotient by the center, $\operatorname{PSL}(2,q)$ is not isomorphic to a subgroup of $\operatorname{SL}(2,q)$ and so every homomorphism $f:\operatorname{SL}(2,q)\to \operatorname{SL}(2,q)$ is either an isomorphism (no kernel) or trivial (whole group is kernel).

In terms of modules, even the regular $\mathbb{Z}$-module does not have this property you want: If $f:\mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}$ then $\ker(f)$ is either zero or $\mathbb{Z}$, even though $\mathbb{Z}$ has lots of submodules.

share|cite|improve this answer
Locally cyclic modules (such as non-semisimple cyclic modules and Prüfer p-groups) also have the property that every submodule is the kernel of an endomorphism, but one no longer has the "orthogonal complement" property that the module is a direct sum of the submodule and a complement. That stronger property is equivalent to semisimple. – Jack Schmidt Sep 3 '12 at 1:34

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.