Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
Category with zero morphisms

Given two objects $X,Y$ in a category, can there be more than one zero morphism $X\rightarrow Y$?

share|cite|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Zhen Lin, sdcvvc, William, Thomas, J. M. Sep 24 '12 at 10:30

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

    
In an answer to your previous question, Qiaochu already indicated that there is a unique zero morphism between any two objects. – Zhen Lin Sep 2 '12 at 5:37
1  
@Zhen Lin, I think what Qiaochu showed was that for a given category, if there is a "collection" of zero morphisms satisfying certain property then that collection is unique. Here I'm talking about "a" zero morphism in the sense that it is both constant morphism and coconstant morphism. – ashpool Sep 2 '12 at 9:04
up vote 7 down vote accepted

The definition of a zero morphism as a morphism that is both constant and coconstant is not a very useful one. Zero morphisms make much more sense in a category with a zero object – since in that case they can be defined to be the unique morphism that factors through the zero object. Under that definition, they are unique.

In the absence of a zero object, stupid things can happen. For example, consider the category $\{ \bullet \rightrightarrows \bullet \}$ with exactly two parallel non-identity arrows. It is essentially vacuous that both of the non-identity arrows are constant and coconstant – but they are distinct by hypothesis.

share|cite|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.