Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let ${\bf C}$ be a category with zero morphisms, i.e., for each $X,Y\in {\bf C}$, there is a morphism $0_{XY}:X\rightarrow Y$ satisfying certain properties ($0_{XY}$ composes with every morphism from $Y$ or to $X$ to give another such). According to Wikipedia, "the collection of $0_{XY}$ is unique." Does it mean that given $X,Y\in{\bf C}$, there can be only one morphism that we can use as $0_{XY}$? When defining kernel and cokernel, one uses these morphisms $0_{XY}$, so it appears as though kernel and cokernel depends on a particular choice of the family of $0_{XY}$, which is very unpleasant.

share|cite|improve this question
A example of citogensis in the wild. – PyRulez Jan 17 '15 at 1:31
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Yes. The idea is the same as the proof of the uniqueness of identities in a monoid. If $f_{X, Y} : X \to Y$ is a family of zero morphisms and $g_{X, Y} : X \to Y$ is another family of zero morphisms, then

$$f_{Y, Z} \circ g_{X, Y} = g_{X, Z} = f_{X, Z}$$

for every triple of objects $X, Y, Z$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Zero morphism in a category $\mathcal C$ with Zero object $O$ from an object $A$ to $B$ which factors through zero object,that is the following diagram hold:

$A\rightarrow O \to B$

Note that this factorization is unique as $O$ is both intial and terminal object.So zero morphism from an object $A$ to $B$ is unique.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.