Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I believe I have proven that the real Lie algebras $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\Bbb{R})$ and $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ are simple. However I have tried searching for results that mention this but they only talk of these Lie algebras as being semi-simple. Is what I have proven false, or is it simply that these Lie algebras are simple and hence semi-simple?

My proof of simplicity uses the fact that we have explicit bases for these two lie algebras. I then proceed to show that there are no $1$ - dimensional ideals, and then using the fact that the Killing form is ad-invariant I know that any $2$ - dimensional ideal would give rise to a one dimensional ideal, namely its orthogonal complement. This contradicts the fact that there are no 1-dimensional ideals, and so the real Lie algebras above are simple.

share|improve this question
For the first one it is certainly true. In fact, for any field $k$ whose characteristic does not divide $n$, $sl_n(k)$ is simple. This can be shown by looking at the usual basis and doing a few computations. – Tobias Kildetoft Aug 31 '12 at 11:59

1 Answer

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Yes they are simple. Semi-simple complex Lie algebras are classified by their Dynkin diagrams and the connected Dynkin diagrams correspond to simple Lie algebras. The complexifications of sl(2) and su(2) is sl(2,C) which has a connected Dynkin diagram and is therefore simple. It follows that its real forms are also simple.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.