Given a Noetherian ring $R$ and a proper ideal $I$ of it, is it true that $\cap_n I^n=0$ as $n$ varies over all natural numbers. If not, is it true if $I$ is a maximal ideal? If not, is it true if $I$ is the maximal ideal of a local ring $R$. If not, is it true under additional assumptions on $R$ (like $R$ is regular)
|
|
It is not true in general: the ideal may well be idempotent! For an example, consider a direct product of two fields: there are two ideals, both maximal and both idempotent. |
|||
|
|
|
See the Section on the Krull Intersection Theorem (currently Section 8.7) in these notes. A version of the theorem valid for any ideal $I$ in a Noetherian ring $R$ is as follows: if there exists $x \in \bigcap_{n=1}^{\infty} I^n$, then $x \in xI$. From this one easily deduces that $\bigcap_{n=1}^{\infty} I^n = \{0\}$ under either of the following additional hypotheses: $\bullet$ $R$ is a domain and $I$ is a proper ideal, or In particular the second condition holds for any proper ideal in a Noetherian local ring. As Mariano remarks, some hypothesis beyond Noetherianity is needed in order to guarantee $\bigcap_n I^n = \{0\}$. I should probably add his counterexample to my notes! |
|||||||||||
|
