Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Assume that $A$ is non-symmetric. "If $A+A^T$ is positive definite, the eigenvalues of $A$ have positive real parts" (originally, it was with negative definite/negative real parts, but I suspect it doesn't matter). This was claimed in a comment of an answer to if eigenvalues are positive, is the matrix positive definite?.

  1. Could anyone provide a proof for this?

  2. Is the other direction true? If yes can anyone present a proof, if not a counterexample.

  3. If $A$ is diagonalizable is the other direction true? If yes can anyone present a proof, if not a counterexample.

Thank you.

(In case anyone wonders what the motivation behind this is, I'm looking into it with the hope of getting some simple geometric intuition for the conditions of asymptotic stability of the origin of a continuous-time LTI system $\dot{x}=Ax$ (i.e. that the eigenvalues have negative real parts). If the other direction of the claim is true, it implies that the angle between the velocity vector $\dot{x}$ and the position vector $x$ is always greater than $\pi/2$, hence the state is always 'being pushed roughly in the direction of the origin'.)

share|improve this question
    
$A+A^T$ is symmetric, thus diagonalizable, and since it is positive definite it is thus similar to a diagonal matrix with strictly positive eigenvalues. $A$'s eigenvalues are equal to $A^T$'s. –  akkkk Aug 29 '12 at 11:33
2  
@Auke: and what can be concluded? –  Fabian Aug 29 '12 at 11:52
    
Fabian: if I'd have a proof I'd give it. These facts can be concluded straight away. Of course the complicating factor here is that $A$'s eigenspaces are different from $A^T$'s. –  akkkk Aug 29 '12 at 11:58
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 5 down vote accepted

I think the following simple argument works, although I'm surprised not to have heard of it before:

If $\lambda \in \mathbb C$ is an eigenvalue of $A$ with eigenvector $x$, then $\lambda |x|^2 = \langle Ax,x \rangle = \langle x,A^T x \rangle = \overline{\langle A^T x, x\rangle}$, so $\langle A^T x, x\rangle = \bar{\lambda} |x|^2.$

Therefore $2\Re{\lambda} |x|^2 = (\lambda + \bar\lambda)|x|^2 = \langle Ax,x\rangle + \langle A^T x,x \rangle = \langle (A+A^T)x,x \rangle > 0.$

The other direction is false even for diagonalizable matrices: $\left(\begin{array}{cc} 1&100\\0&2\end{array}\right)$ has positive eigenvalues, but not when added to its transpose.

If we make the very strong assumption that $A$ is normal, then the converse holds by looking at $\exp(-At) \exp(-A^T t) = \exp(-(A+A^T)t)$.

share|improve this answer
    
Wait, maybe I am confused but isn't in general $<x,x>\neq |x|^2$ if $x$ is complex. –  Simon Markett Aug 29 '12 at 12:37
1  
@SimonMarkett I'm using the complex inner product $\langle x, y\rangle = y^H x$ (my convention is that it's linear in the first argument). –  Erick Wong Aug 29 '12 at 12:42
    
Thanks Erick, however what about a proof for the converse in the case that $A$ is diagonalizable? (I meant to put this in the question originally and I forgot ><, adding it now...). –  jkn Aug 29 '12 at 12:55
    
@JuanKuntz My mistake: I have edited the answer to show that diagonalizability (even over $\mathbb R$) makes no difference. However, normality seems to be sufficient. –  Erick Wong Aug 29 '12 at 13:06
    
@ErickWong Cheers Erick. –  jkn Aug 29 '12 at 13:49
add comment

consider the following dynamical system: $$\dot{x}=Ax$$ Lets study the stability of this system knowing that $A+A^T<0$.

Consider the following Lyapunov function $$V=x^Tx$$ Taking the derivative along the system dynamics we have $$\dot{V}=\dot{x}^Tx+x^T\dot{x}=x^T(A^T+A)x<0$$ Therefore, the system is globally (the Lyapunov function is radially unbounded) asymptotically stable (here actually it is globally exponentially stable), meaning that $A$ is Hurwitz (the real part of all eigenvalues is negative).

Well this is the solution from Control and Systems perspective!!

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, sara sa. I'm very familiar with the above ^^. The point of the above exercise was to give some geometric simple intuition to a group of undergrads who are not going to be taught about Lyapunov functions. –  jkn Aug 30 '12 at 19:56
    
I understand my solution is not what you were looking for, that is way I added the last line (just a different approach:)) –  sara Aug 30 '12 at 19:58
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.