Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This isn't quite homework, but it might as well be. I'm working through Needham's Visual Complex Analysis and I'm finding myself stuck on the following problem:

Explain geometrically why the the locus of z such that $\mathrm{arg}(\frac{z-a}{z-b})=\theta$ is an arc of a certain circle passing through the fixed points a and b.

My first thought was to think about what $\mathrm{arg}(z)=\theta$ means, and I think it should be a line starting at the origin and going in the direction of $\theta$. I also understand that, supposing that we were able to find one z that satisfies this condition, we could find another z by moving the vector in a way that increases the argument of $z-a$ while decreasing the argument if $z-b$.

I'm looking for a hint. Can anyone subtly nudge me in the right direction? I'm having trouble seeing why this has to be the arc of a circle. Also, how can the arc pass through b? Would the fraction $\frac{z-a}{z-b}$ be undefined for z = b? How can it pass through a? Wouldn't the fraction be the zero vector for z = a ?

share|improve this question
1  
Note that $arg((z-a)/(z-b))$ gives the angle between $z-a$ and $z-b$. –  Potato Aug 26 '12 at 3:19

2 Answers 2

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The problem says that the circle passes through a and b, not necessarily the arc of the circle . I hope the image below jogs some memories from geometry class, or leads you to a new fun fact--as the case may be.

Good luck!

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
    
I'm pretty familiar with this theorem, but am having trouble connecting it to the problem. –  MBP Aug 26 '12 at 3:38
    
Jeeze, ok. Looking back, I think that there were three things that kept me from solving this problem. (1) I was trying to visualize $\frac{z-a}{z-b}$ all at once. (2) I was thinking of the angle between $z-a$ and $z$, and the angle between $z-b$ and $z$ as two separate angles instead of as one fixed angle between $z-a$ and $z-b$. (3) My drawings of z, a and b weren't done in a way that would remind me of inscribed angles. Should've tinkered more with the picture. –  MBP Aug 26 '12 at 4:18

with $r$ free and $\theta$ fixed. Think of $z-a$ as the vector from $a$ to $z$, and $z-b$ similarly. Dividing subtracts their angles, giving the angle between them. So in plain english, this is the same thing as saying "all $z$ that form the same angle with $a$ and $b$". Do you see why this definition gives a circular arc?

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, but that isn't helping me. If the angle between a and z is the same as the angle between b and z, then z is the bisector of the angle between a and b. But the z that bisect the angle between a and b are all in one line. Help me out: I'm sure I'm misunderstanding you. –  MBP Aug 26 '12 at 3:48
    
Ah, wait, OK, I think I'm seeing this. a, z and b are all points on the edge of the circle? –  MBP Aug 26 '12 at 4:08
    
@MBP Yes! $a,b,z$ are all points on the circle that Justin Laimer posted. The key thing looking at that image is that the angle between $z-a$ (the line from $z$ to $a$) and $z-b$ (similar) is constant. –  Robert Mastragostino Aug 26 '12 at 4:15

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.