Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

For this problem, let there is a sequence $\{y_n\}$ which is complete in $Y$ such that this sequence has finitely many distinct points and this sequence approaches to say $y$. In this case $y$ is repeated infinitely many times. In this scenario, there may exist open ball $B(y;r)$ which only contains $y$ and so $y$ can't be the accumulation point of this sequence. So however $Y$ is complete, it is not closed.

I am not able to understand the mistake.

share|cite|improve this question
What does this have to do with descriptive set theory? – Chris Eagle Aug 25 '12 at 17:02

Completeness is not a property of sequences; I’m going to assume that you mean that $\langle y_n:n\in\Bbb N\rangle$ is a Cauchy sequence. If it has only finitely many distinct terms and is Cauchy, then there are a $y\in Y$ and an $n_0\in\Bbb N$ such that $y_n=y$ for all $n\ge n_0$. (You should try to prove this.) In other words, the sequence is eventually constant at $y$. Then every open ball $B(y,r)$ contains $\{y_n:n\ge n_0\}$, so of course the sequence converges to $y$. In other words, $y$ is the limit of the sequence. Note that $y_{n_0},y_{n_0+1},y_{n_0+2},\dots$ are different terms of the sequence even though they all happen to be the same point. $\langle 1,1,1,\dots\rangle$ is an infinite sequence of real numbers even though it’s a constant sequence.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.